View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old -22-04-2006
RamsFanSam's Avatar
RamsFanSam
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Springfield, MO
Age: 46
Posts: 1,748
Rep Power: 24
RamsFanSam has a brilliant futureRamsFanSam has a brilliant futureRamsFanSam has a brilliant futureRamsFanSam has a brilliant futureRamsFanSam has a brilliant futureRamsFanSam has a brilliant futureRamsFanSam has a brilliant futureRamsFanSam has a brilliant futureRamsFanSam has a brilliant futureRamsFanSam has a brilliant futureRamsFanSam has a brilliant future
Re: NFL should bring Rams back to L.A.

Quote:
To fix this predicament, the NFL's first move should be to bring the Rams back to Los Angeles.
Um.....No.

This would be like giving Iraq a lot of biological weapons if they promise to drop their nuclear program.

The best thing would be to leave the Rams in St. Louis, where they are. It's best for the Rams, St. Louis, and the NFL. Los Angeles had the Rams once, and lost them. They had the Raiders once...and they left. Even the Chargers were in LA once, and they got out of there, too.

Know what that says to me? LA doesn't have the football fever. But, if they really want a team, they should take the whiners out of San Francisco. The Bay area would still have the Faders, and I don't think it would be too hard for LA to have more fans in the stands for the whiners than SF has. I'd bet that Pfleugerville, Texas could get more people in the stadium than San Francisco. And, if LA can get the whiners to move there, then the name could be changed to one of these:
1. The Earthquakes
2. The Mudslides
3. The Condors
4. The Hollywood Stars
5. The Fruits and Nuts
or, my personal favorite...
6. The TEMPORARIES!
__________________
Reply With Quote