[Fortuninerhater]

In that case, I stand corrected Nick.

General counsel, Dickerson demanded to be traded because we were to cheap to pay him what he was worth and deserved.

No he wasn't an intrigal part of a superbowl win ( through no fault of his own), but he certainly was the Rams MVP every season he wore a Rams uniform. Can Faulk say that? No. But that's neither here, nor there.

Don't get me wrong, they were both as great as they came, but my point was, if Dickerson's number wasn't retired, then no Ram RB should be.

But since #29 is retired, #28 can take his rightful place beside him.