View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old -27-06-2006
ramsbruce's Avatar
ramsbruce
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Here
Age: 36
Posts: 3,238
Rep Power: 24
ramsbruce has a brilliant futureramsbruce has a brilliant futureramsbruce has a brilliant futureramsbruce has a brilliant futureramsbruce has a brilliant futureramsbruce has a brilliant futureramsbruce has a brilliant futureramsbruce has a brilliant futureramsbruce has a brilliant futureramsbruce has a brilliant futureramsbruce has a brilliant future
Re: Bernie: Deal in Place for Bennett

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick
There really aren't a lot of options in the free agent market, though I'm not sure we need to bring in another 'back if it turns out Faulk can and will play in 2006.

But that said, I just don't enjoy the idea of trading a third or fourth round pick on a guy we could have signed as a free agent. It's one thing to trade a seventh rounder for that kind of player, as we did with Ragone.

To trade a third or fourth would be pretty significant. Maybe I just overvalue draft picks, but I don't like watching us trade first or early second day picks for guys we could have signed much earlier.
Right, I agree the picks are too high. I was assuming when I asked my question that if we did sign Bennett that Faulk won't play this year. Maybe we will have to overpay because we are out of options. :down:
__________________
Reply With Quote