View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old -30-08-2006
Nick's Avatar
Nick
Status: Online
Superbowl MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Morgantown, WV
Age: 26
Posts: 11,495
Rep Power: 45
Nick has a reputation beyond reputeNick has a reputation beyond reputeNick has a reputation beyond reputeNick has a reputation beyond reputeNick has a reputation beyond reputeNick has a reputation beyond reputeNick has a reputation beyond reputeNick has a reputation beyond reputeNick has a reputation beyond reputeNick has a reputation beyond reputeNick has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Who will be the No. 6 WR

If I had to pick a #6 receiver, it'd be Hagans over Pyatt. But...


Quote:
Originally Posted by RAMarkable View Post
I would just as soon the Rams keep only 5 Wrs (Holt, Bruce, Curtis, McDonald, and Looker) and use the other slot for either Hedgecock or Jerome Collins. As posted elsewhere, I do not think either Hagans or Pyatt have done enough to warrant a position on this team.
I tend to agree. I really haven't seen enough from either for me to feel as if we need to carrying a sixth receiver. Pyatt has two preseason catches, Hagans has one. Not enough for me to want to keep either based on production at the receiver position (though one of Pyatt's grabs was a long one), and neither has wowed me at their respective specialist positions.

Plus, if the Rams really have decided to go with McDonald on punt returns, is there really a point in keeping Hagans? The guy's a project at receiver whose only immediate contribution would have been on special teams. Take that away, and I have to wonder if the practice squad wouldn't be a better destination. That being said, it's hard to send a fifth rounder to the practice squad, so I'm not going to be surprised either way.
Reply With Quote