[quote=BIG-BLUE;134586]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Varg6
Afterthoughts from a Sane man…
By Jake Cohn (Varg6)
Well Varg6, I'm going to submit a little debate on your point with the O-line.
You state that maybe lets say we only gave up one sack, would we have been any better on offense? You say no. Well I say hell yea. Give any team back 5 sacks & the outcome will be a whole lot better. Play options open, drives stay alive, time is eaten of the clock if needed. Any time we can secure the ball & keep the opposing teams offense off the field. We are doing a whole lot better.
Lets say on one of those sacks Holt was just seconds from being wide open downfield, Bulger has time, hits him in stride & boom 6 points on the board. Tie game. Lets say on another sack that we get back were at the niners 30 & its 3rd & 5, instead of being sacked the play goes for no gain we still have a shot at a field goal. Wilkens in & we have a legitmite shot at beating the niners.
So you see i do rest alot of the blame on the poor play by the O-line not all of it, but they had more than thier fair share of miscues.
|
Oh, I know what you mean, exactly man, I do. It's just what I was trying to say was that the offense as a whole just isn't "comfortable" with the new scheme they have right now, and that was probably a horrid example, but I was just trying to say, either which way, our offense would've still been just as confused.