View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old -20-10-2006
RamFan_Til_I_Die's Avatar
RamFan_Til_I_Die
Status: Online
Ram MVP
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Age: 32
Posts: 1,470
Rep Power: 16
RamFan_Til_I_Die has much to be proud ofRamFan_Til_I_Die has much to be proud ofRamFan_Til_I_Die has much to be proud ofRamFan_Til_I_Die has much to be proud ofRamFan_Til_I_Die has much to be proud ofRamFan_Til_I_Die has much to be proud ofRamFan_Til_I_Die has much to be proud ofRamFan_Til_I_Die has much to be proud ofRamFan_Til_I_Die has much to be proud of
Re: Holmgren supports runoff rule as is

It's also very easy for him to say when he was on the winning side of the stupid rule. Ask any Raider fan/organization member about other lame rules, and they will go crazy and kill people in their tirade about the famous "tuck" rule. Ask any Patriot fan/organization member and they will justify that stealing of a win to the end. Stupid rules can be overlooked (even though they shouldn't be) when the don't literally change the outcome of the game. When they do have a direct effect on the game, even if they only come into play once a year, they need to be perfected. This rule needs to be better defined and implemented before someone loses another game involving it or worse yet a playoff or Superbowl game.
__________________
Reply With Quote