View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old -31-10-2006
Goldenfleece's Avatar
Goldenfleece
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: D.C. Suburbs
Age: 26
Posts: 2,004
Rep Power: 21
Goldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud ofGoldenfleece has much to be proud of
Re: The bottom line on Fisher

Quote:
The point is that WW's play in the San Diego game stunk mostly because of the big plays he allowed. Do I wish WW was benched? Hell no. I am glad he is a RAM? Hell yes. That being said, do I wish Fisher did more in terms of creating turnovers? Absolutely. But to say Fisher was the weak link against San Diego is just beyond ridiculous.
Good point. When LT is averaging 7.3 yards/carry they don't have to bother testing our corners. Not one of the Chargers' scores was the result of Fisher's miscues. There was no single weak link in that game; there were tons of them. Spoon made some good tackles in run support but struggled in coverage. Little got some pressure on Rivers but got man-handled in the running game. On most of the big runs, I couldn't see where Coakley had gone off to. Just about all of our defensive backs missed tackles in run defense that could have prevented big gains and/or TDs. We need more from pretty much every defender on the field.
Reply With Quote