[general counsel]

Tanus, i do understand your point and i am not necessarily disagreeing with you. High risk equals high reward.

My point is that (not directed at you) many of the people that are mentioning martz today are the same that were blasting him in the past. The grass is always greener. I supported martz as well, like everyone, he had his plusses and minuses.

With anything in life, you have to take the good with the bad. The martz offense had more fireworks and sure we won at time while losing the turnover battle, but only when we had a much stronger offensive line than we have right now.

People continue to underestimate the combination of the loss of pace and also mcollom. Not because incognitio has been bad, i think he has been good, but that we are considerably weaker at guard because richie isnt playing there. In addition, timmerman is not the same player he was even a couple of years ago.

The deterioration of the offensive line is the single biggest contributing factor into the deterioration of the rams offense. That and the fact that we dont have a peak marshall faulk, which is another story. Jackson is doing very well this year and he is not the cause of our scoring woes.

ramming speed to all

general counsel