Thread: howard on turk
View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old -22-03-2007
general counsel's Avatar
general counsel
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: atlanta, georgia
Age: 46
Posts: 3,656
Rep Power: 30
general counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond reputegeneral counsel has a reputation beyond repute
howard on turk

according to howard balzer, who i consider to be the single best source of ACCURATE rams related information, the rams have offered turk a one year contract for the vet minimum.

That is a disgrace. As howard points out, they paid more for steussie and they have the same kind of need for turk. How can you blame turk when he has a super year and all the rams offer him is the minimum.

I am a big defender of the front office, but on this point, i am going to blast away if we lose turk. There is no justification for an offer of the vet minimum to a guy that not only is very very good, but is truly a position of need for the rams. This is NOT a marginal punter who can be easily replaced.

ramming speed to all

general counsel
__________________

Reply With Quote