Thread: what about 3-4??
View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old -25-03-2007
Bar-bq's Avatar
Bar-bq
Status: Online
Registered User
  
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 1,611
Rep Power: 25
Bar-bq has a reputation beyond reputeBar-bq has a reputation beyond reputeBar-bq has a reputation beyond reputeBar-bq has a reputation beyond reputeBar-bq has a reputation beyond reputeBar-bq has a reputation beyond reputeBar-bq has a reputation beyond reputeBar-bq has a reputation beyond reputeBar-bq has a reputation beyond reputeBar-bq has a reputation beyond reputeBar-bq has a reputation beyond repute
Re: what about 3-4??
I still don't think the 3-4 is the answer. We don't have the massive NT required to even dabble in the 3-4 allignment. We'd get absolutely torched.

As for getting better on defense- tally ho!
Reply With Quote