View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old -21-05-2007
DaddoRam's Avatar
DaddoRam
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Columbia, MO USA
Age: 42
Posts: 103
Rep Power: 8
DaddoRam - is moving towards the light
Re: The Hidden Dangers of the Mainstream

I think it was a well-written piece, and for the sake of keeping the peace it was probably good to be a little soft on the main issues here, and not really tell the full story yet.
I think the time will come when it's been long enough that we can look back and say that Martz's record was far, far, far too successful for there to be so many people ripping the guy, that it's inexplicable and wrong for so many Rams fans to have the level of outright hate the guy built up. Yes, he went against the "way it would seem to the average fan things ought to be done," but again the record spoke for itself. Those who raised cain about his challenges were to be asked "how many NFL wins do YOU have a head coach" but that never happened, the naysayers got louder and louder and weren't challenged enough, and eventually the press jumped on board in ways that were inappropriate and ugly but which played right into the hands of a large segment of fans. I'd come into the whole sordid affair with a pretty high personal regard for Rams management, and came away thinking they left a whole lot to be desired. They should have very early in the whole thing come out strongly supportive of the coach, backed him when people who don't know .0002 percent as much about pro football were bashing the daylights out of him on the radio for unpopular decisions about timeouts and challenges, decisions quickly forgotten when successful and saved away in a gunny sack, all of which would be used to beat him up, when unsuccessful. The team won more games over the period than all but a handful of coaches in the first few years of their career in league history. When fans read about the way fans turned on him, they'll think the teams when 3-13 or something.
I continue to think that in addition to a depressing lack of support from the front office (probably because of personal disagreements about which we'll probably never know the full story) the main reasons behind some fans' vicious hatred of Martz revolve around two things...one, the benching of Kurt Warner and disagreements with him and his family, and two, the Super Bowl loss to New England. And I think the further from both we get, the more time will show Martz was right in both cases.
On the Warner issue, emotions ran extremely high. Here was a very popular player who won everyone's heart with his back-story while bringing the Rams our first championship since 1951 being tossed aside for Marc Bulger, of whom most of us had barely heard. That one's easy to get fired up about at the time, but I think the lack of success Kurt's had (which is really too bad, I'll continue to root for him and hope he makes a comeback somewhere down the line, as long as he's not beating the Rams in the process) and Bulger's developing into one of the better QBs in the league backs that one up pretty well. But even those who supported the move, or at least saw it was working out, weren't going to ease up on Martz.
The Super Bowl was an immense disappointment to us all. I think we foolishly assumed we'd win the thing big...we were still "The Greatest Show" and nobody realized at all how great that Pats team would prove to be. We didn't know Tom Brady was the Tom Brady we now know. Who'd have guessed Belichek would be viewed as the best coach in the league in a few years? I think most of us assumed we'd beat the Pats by 14 or 17 points. Instead, a heart-breaking last second defeat. And when a game you expect to win easily is lost, someone's gotta be blamed, usually the coach. There was a ton of criticism after the game about playcalling and the "mix," people saying we should have run more and passed less, looking for more "balance." Consider for a second the old adage about "dance with the one who brung you." We had the greatest pass offense in league history quite possibly, AND we were pretty far behind much of the second half. In addition, during times in the game when we DID try to establish the run, it failed miserably. Martz was right to continue trying to throw the ball in the 2nd half, and it very nearly led to a come-from-behind win. Had we done so, or had the Pats kicker shanked that FG, Martz would still be at Earth City, I'd wager.
One also has to do something I almost NEVER do in times like this, which drives me crazy when others do it to much, but it just has to be at least mentioned in regards to the Super Bowl loss...point fingers at officials.
A big part of the passing game for the Rams was Marshall Faulk. He was being held on every pass play and it almost never got called. My opinion? Sour grapes? Nope...the words of the Pats defenders themselves! One play on which it WAS called, the NE Interception return for TD which was called back, led a Pats defender in the locker room after the game to utter "we did that on every play!"
And if you watch the tape, yep, they sure did. The only problem was it was against the rules. The league's reaction was a LOT of help, pretending to change the rule in the offseason when in fact all they did was remind officials that this was illegal and tell them to stop ignoring it.
There's been a lot of discussion about this one, but very little about a call I think was just as vital on the key play of the game, ANOTHER interception, this one also a New England TD only this one not called back. It wasn't a good throw and was a good defensive play, but after the throw Warner got clobbered with a helmet-to-helmet hit. These were supposedly cut down during the season, with fines and even suspensions for violators. During the regular season, this would have been called back, a 15 yard penalty called, and the Rams given first and ten. No flag came out, and what's amazing to me is that there was so little discussion about this one, even though THAT is the picture that made the cover of Sports Illustrated the next week. That one just blows my mind.
One word was an overwhelming part of the discussion in the final months of this sad affair..."arrogance." Yes, Mike Martz was so arrogant about his abilities being greater than the drunken guy in row 47 who played 2 years of high school football 25 years ago yelling "Go for it!!" while Martz punts, or vice-versa. Yeah, he came across as arrogant in the media, too. Maybe he was.

Name me an NFL head coach who is humble in insecure. Arrogance is pretty much a requirement for an NFL head coach, for anyone who is at that level of any professional sport, you HAVE to assume you know very well what you're doing, and it's not up for a vote of the fans. That's true for coaches who don't have Martz's gaudy record and a couple of Super Bowl appearances.

By the time he finally was fired I was just so disgusted with the whole thing I was almost glad it was over. It became obvious he had no hope of making it when they didn't even let him call his coaches during a game, and that this perversely strange incident was made public knowledge. There were people at Earth City trying to make MM look bad. The team had a poor season, no surprise given the uproar around them and lack of reliable coaching and distractions to burn, and I was so sick of the attitude of so many of the fans that it was almost a relief, thank God at least it's done.
Only it wasn't. Not content to have run a winning coach out of town because they disliked him, they continued and continue to attack him, his decisions, his character, his honesty, his clothes and hair. A record shows the Martz time as one of the most successful eras in the last couple of decades for any NFL team, yet to hear most fans discuss him you'd have thought we were talking about Rich Brooks.
He'll not be brought back, of course. Nothing's going to change, so maybe there's no point in even bringing it up, one should just let the people who hate him so hate him and just ignore them. But if we're going to take a dispassionate look at the whole incident, the role of the fan and the very solid proof that in fact they were wrong and Martz was a very good coach has to be part of the debate.
But don't worry, I've no intention of wasting much time in said debate. Letting these guys get my goat was a big mistake, and it's robbed me of much of my enjoyment of the Rams and football the last couple of years. When we turned things around and first made the playoffs in '99, a local TV station branded me the biggest Rams fan in my part of the state, a pretty significant honor of which I'm really proud. If you'd have told me at that point that I'd have watched and talked about as LITTLE pro football as I have the last 18 months, I'd have assumed it meant I had my head chopped off or something. But it's not. I just love football so much and to see it messed up as badly as it was in my eyes made it downright painful to watch. I was disgusted with a whole lot of my fellow fans, people who claim to love the Rams yet boo their own players, an inexcusable act, or sit on their hands silently or leave early or not show up at all because of a few losses in a playoff season in which the old Rams fans would have seen them through to the Super Bowl one or two more times...I just couldn't stand it. I couldn't stand to immerse myself in Rams information 24/7 when even Bernie was taking cheap shots in print at Martz. I know the guy has papers to sell, but I really expected more. Groups so devoted to the Rams through thick and thin that people made constant jokes about us were overrun with "Man, these guys stink!" types. It just stopped being fun.
Meanwhile, the league continues it's ridiculous moves toward so much "parity" that there's no excellence left in the league. Good players are moved out or cut or traded because of the phony-baloney "salary cap," rewarding mismanagement and incompetence and punishing success and excellence. The league's ultimate goal appears to be 32 8-8 teams, and one year they'll succeed. The last couple of Super Bowl winners have been good, but not great teams. That Patriots team that put a nice little run together was the only thing even close to the great teams of the past, the old Packers or Steelers or Cowboys or whiners would have destroyed the most recent Steelers team which won it all or last year's...uh, who was it? Oh, yeah, those Colts. Decent enough story, pretty good offense, Manning...and a mediocre defense. Think THAT'S greatness?
Is there ANY greatness left in the league, aside from individual greatness in guys like Little and Holt? It's got me watching more college ball, where we can still see real greatness and excellence. Yes, it WILL mean some teams have no chance of winning. As it should be. Some teams aren't as good if some teams are great. It means that occassionally we'll see a 63-7 game, but that's what SHOULD happen when a Nebraska or Oklahoma or Florida plays Duke or Rice or (God bless the poor guys) Minnesota. I followed an Oklahoma State team as a kid that once or twice a year could be counted upon to lose by 40 or 50 to the Sooners or Huskers or Buffalos. Some teams are great, we weren't. The answer to that was for Oklahoma State to keep working and getting better, not to throw chocks under the wheels of greatness so everyone else had a chance.
We should do the same in the NFL. Instead of rejoicing because 85% of the league is still eligible for post-season play in week 15, they should realize that a team which is 7-8 doesn't DESERVE to be in the playoffs. We need to go back to loving the NFL because of the greatness of the teams of lore, Lombardi's Packers and Landry's Cowboys and even perhaps Vermeil/Martz's Rams, at least for a year or two, instead of tearing them apart so that Cardinals and Bengals fans have a "reason" to buy tickets in December.

So between the league's screwy rules and fans who lack the decency and dignity to support thier team on good days and bad, and fans and press running off a coach with a great, great record of success because of one loss and moves that TV bigmouth commentators don't "get" I let myself get dragged down. I let watching football become a chore, something that I did because it's what I did, not because it's what I wanted. And last season I even missed a couple. I work at the church and instead of running out like the devil was chasing me on NFL Sundays, I stayed behind a little longer and got updates on my cell phone. I stopped sending away for tapes of any games I may have missed recording, and stopped spending the rest of a week watching last Sundays game for tendencies and to see magic I may have missed. I had so much anger and sadness about the last few years, the attitude that permiated the Dome, that it just became something different. Things changed.
Now, I look at things a little differently. I was never a player...I was a scrawny little thing in high school, I've caught up and then some sense but when I was a kid I'd have been killed trying to play football. But I spent more time around the game than a lot of players, as a trainer and coach. And I remembered that the players and people closest to the game always knew that even when they heard the knuckleheads in the stands, they didn't make decisions, they didn't have to face the music if mistakes were made, they didn't have to run gassers till they puked or risk losing a scholorship or a career. If it means getting more into my own relationship (imagined, or course...but we're ALL fans and ALL have some imagination in the Rams being "us," in "our" game this weekend, in how "we" are 8-4 going into the bye week, in how "we" will do against San Fran) with the team, how I react to players and coaches and plays and wins and losses. I still want to visit with my friends online, this can still be awfully fun. But I'm going to do it a lot less, and argue a lot less when someone's saying something so foul and wrong that I know what I ought go do. I'm going to go back and find where the joy was in the game, where it was that I made myself into the biggest Rams fan in Central MO, to the point of following the team in LA when surrounded by Chiefs fans, so overjoyed as to be almost in tears when it was announced that they were moving down the road, the magic moment of my first trip to the new dome to see my Rams in person for the first time (playing road kill for the Saints) and then the exctasy of every minute of the 99 season, from the final gun of the final game of '98, defending Tony Banks and promising "Next year, we'll be so much better you won't believe it." Predicting a successful season (and missing it by one game, you can look it up, I said 14-2, and if Vermeil had really tried in Philly or Wilkins makes lousy kick in Nashville I'd have nailed it) and all the comments and congratulations from friends who realized how this guy who'd been loyal to the worst team in the league, whether they were on the other side of the world or right down the street, and how WE deserved this championship and the joy that went with that last Mike Jones tackle.
We gotta get THAT feeling back. If I find others with it, I'll enjoy their company on Sundays. If I don't, I'll find it within myself. If I have to turn off the sound on the TV to drown out dopey announcers and rotten "fans" booing our own boys, I'll do it. It's time to get back where I belong, with the Rams 100% win lose or draw. I got disgusted with the league, with a lot of fans, maybe even with myself. But the boys never let me down, and that's where I'm staying, no matter who the front office puts out to coach, the Rams are my team and I'm with them for keeps, every day and every season. Running off Martz was foul and stupid, but it's also over. Like every other mistake, it's been survived, and now we can move forward into a new season, one with all the promise and all the potential you'll allow yourself to see. I'm going to find plenty. Will you join me?

Go Rams!
Reply With Quote