Thread: Why?
View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old -30-10-2007
r8rh8rmike's Avatar
r8rh8rmike
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Age: 49
Posts: 4,715
Rep Power: 33
r8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanus View Post
Do you have a good reason why you think it gave us the best possible chance to succeed? I still haven't heard anyone say why they would rather put the game in the hands of the banged up OL and Brian Leonard over our two best players on the field at the time in Marc Bulger and Torry Holt.

Did you guys not notice what happened to our running game after SJ and Cogs went out? With SJ and a healthy OL, I have no problems with trying to run for it.
I thought you gave up?

Okay, here's what I think, it was a single yard against the Browns. Yes they stopped 3 other short yardage tries, but like Nick mentioned earlier, when you consider all the bad things that can happen on a pass play, a run to get 1 yard is the best bet. It's true Bulger was having a very good day, but he still had times where he was erratic and the Browns were pinning their ears back and getting close to him most of the game. Taking everything into consideration, the call was a prudent one IMO.
Reply With Quote