Thread: Why?
View Single Post
  #29 (permalink)  
Old -30-10-2007
r8rh8rmike's Avatar
r8rh8rmike
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Age: 49
Posts: 4,713
Rep Power: 33
r8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Why?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanus View Post
You must like to bang your head up against a wall too.
Aw, but I never said I give up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tanus View Post
So the only thing that can happen bad on a run play is it gets stuffed? What if the QB and RB fumble the exchange? What if the RB fumbles? What if the RB trips behind the line? What if an OL steps on the QB's foot as he is turning back to hand the ball off?

Lots of things can go wrong on any given play. To use that as your reasoning for selecting a running play that hasn't worked all game long is weak, IMO.
You're entitled to your opinion, but I was referencing things that were actually happening in the game against Cleveland. If you want to make the argument that some kind of pass play has just as much of a chance for failure as a straight run up the middle, you're fooling yourself, IMO.
Reply With Quote