View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old -05-11-2007
r8rh8rmike's Avatar
r8rh8rmike
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Age: 49
Posts: 4,659
Rep Power: 31
r8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The "offensive" offensive line

Quote:
Originally Posted by AvengerRam View Post
This implies that there is something that has been built up that can be torn down, and there is something that has started, which would be prematurely ended.

I don't see where Linehan has done anything to build up a system.
You don't? Didn't he install a new offense that was pretty productive last year when reasonably healthy? Didn't he bring in a new defensive coordinator that has made progress with a revamped unit? Hasn't he drafted some promoising young players that are starting to pay dividends? I don't think you're looking hard enough.

We both know that if a new coaching staff is brought in, there will be changes that will require time, maybe substantial time. I think it would be better to make an educated judgement on Linehan and many of his players (especially the OL group) under normal circumstances. You obviously disagree, haven't seen anything positive and think a change is needed, which is fine. At this point, I guess we'll have to leave it at that and see what happens.
Reply With Quote