View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old -01-08-2004
r8rh8rmike's Avatar
r8rh8rmike
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Age: 49
Posts: 4,482
Rep Power: 27
r8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant future
Re: There's no marked change in Marc Bulger

Quote:
He has never been about the glitter, the endorsements, the radio and TV shows.
Quote:
And I think doing too many things would hurt this team rather than help it."
Quote:
"There's not going to be a table," Bulger said. "I don't have my own football card to give out (as Warner did), so I can't get the table going. ... I'll sign my share but I'm not going to go out looking or anything."
Quote:
"Ultimately, that's what a football team wants. They don't want somebody that they can't relate to."
It's hard to tell the intent and context of these responses, but they all COULD be referencing Kurt Warner. The last one about "don't want somebody that they can't relate to" bothers me somewhat. Maybe I'm being too critical, but that's the way I feel.

If the team is trying to put Warner behind them, why not avoid comparisons or statements that MIGHT seem critical towards him? The fact that "no disrespect to Warner" has to even be said tells me without that disclaimer, it WOULD appear as disrespect to Warner.

I'm sure I'll get over all this and let it go when the press and more importantly the team let it go.

Last edited by r8rh8rmike; -01-08-2004 at 08:50 PM.
Reply With Quote