Thread: Boston Herald-Possible Rams/Pats Superbowl Spygate?
View Single Post
  #117 (permalink)  
Old -04-02-2008
txramsfan's Avatar
txramsfan
Status: Offline
Pro Bowl Ram
  
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 44
Posts: 5,847
Rep Power: 24
txramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud oftxramsfan has much to be proud of
Re: Boston Herald-Possible Rams/Pats Superbowl Spygate?
Honestly guys, we had way too many turnovers in that game. I do agree that Warner got hit in the head on his interception throw, but I doubt if that play was on the walk through tape. Proehl's fumble was a huge play in the first half.

We went to soft on defense on the final drive. 1:30 or so left and NE had no timeouts? Lovie went prevent? The defense was fresh, it wasn't like the Titans game when the D was exhausted. They were barely on the field in the fourth quarter. We should have blitzed Brady, not let him pick us apart like he did.

Yea, the walk through taping was bush league....but I doubt if it had any significant ramifications to the final score in that game.
__________________
Why do people say "I don't mean to interrupt BUT". If you don't mean to interrupt, don't interrupt.
Reply With Quote