View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old -16-02-2008
ramsbruce's Avatar
ramsbruce
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Here
Age: 36
Posts: 3,173
Rep Power: 21
ramsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud of
Re: The Patriots Are Showing Their Guilt, And The NFL Doesn't Want To See The Proof

Quote:
Originally Posted by r8rh8rmike View Post
Why would the Patriots care what Walsh has after Belicheat openly admitted to Goodell that the Patriots have been taping opponents since 2000? If Walsh produces evidence, Belicheat will just reiterate his claim that he thought it was legal. Goodell must be pulling his hair out.
We don't need Walsh for the defensive signal taping, we need him for taping the closed practice/walkthorugh. The Pats care because taping a closed practice/walkthrough right before the Superbowl really raises the cheating bar. Belicheat can't just say oh I thought taping closed practices/walkthorughs was legal also. Even if he does it just won't fly like the signal taping did. It should also mean more penalties/fines at the very least for the Pats, so they care.

Last edited by ramsbruce; -16-02-2008 at 12:13 PM.
Reply With Quote