View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old -16-02-2008
r8rh8rmike's Avatar
r8rh8rmike
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Age: 49
Posts: 4,313
Rep Power: 26
r8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant future
Re: The Patriots Are Showing Their Guilt, And The NFL Doesn't Want To See The Proof

Quote:
Originally Posted by ramsbruce View Post
We don't need Walsh for the defensive signal taping, we need him for taping the closed practice/walkthorugh. The Pats care because taping a closed practice/walkthrough right before the Superbowl really raises the cheating bar. Belicheat can't just say oh I thought taping closed practices/walkthorughs was legal also. Even if he does it just won't fly like the signal taping did. It should also mean more penalties/fines at the very least for the Pats, so they care.
I hope you're right, but my impression is that Belicheat is trying to diffuse any and all taping issues with the "I thought it was legal" excuse. In any case, this story continues to get a lot of traction and seems to be gaining momemtum, regardless of how much the NFL wants it to go away.
Reply With Quote