Quote:
Originally Posted by ramsbruce
On the flipside I think we are thin at WR. We have Holt with knee problems, Bennett who can't seem to stay healthy and then a few young guys and most likely a rookie or two. So purely from a business/Rams team standpoint I think they made a mistake not keeping Bruce for two reasons. One we need the depth, and two the leadership he brings. I don't think the price tag was too high.
|
I couldn't agree more ramsbruce. IMO, the case could be made that Ike was our best, most dependable WR at a time when we're looking suspect, and letting him go was not only a bad public relations move, it was a bad business move, and ultimately a bad player personnel move.
Business is business, but the bottom line is not always the best course of action.