View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old -07-03-2008
moklerman's Avatar
moklerman
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,357
Rep Power: 10
moklerman is just really nicemoklerman is just really nicemoklerman is just really nicemoklerman is just really nicemoklerman is just really nice
FAIR WARNING: This is a Kurt Warner thread

Something I was talking about in a different thread got me curious about something else. I talked a little, on some forum which I forget, that Warner was playing like his GSOT self now that he had the gloves. This idea was not met warmly but I hadn't really looked at the final numbers for 2007.

Also, the last few years I've come to appreciate some of the finer nuances of looking at stat's from all the online arguments that I've put myself in. In this case, a QB's numbers can be deceiving. TD totals and INT totals can be misleading because they often aren't linked to the attempts it took to get them. This may seem obvious but it really is glossed over or just plain overlooked. I've come to the opinion that it's a much better indicator of evaluating a QB than the actual totals in a lot of cases.

Anyway, here are the numbers:

1999 - 41td/13int 8.2% 2.6%
2000 - 21td/18int 6.1% 5.2%
2001 - 36td/22int 6.6% 4.0%

2007 - 27td/17int 6.0% 3.8%
(and, because this is MY thread his TD% should have been 6.4% if not for Rattay vulturing goal line attempts)

Either way though, his 2007 numbers are very comparable to the last two GSOT years.
Reply With Quote