Quote:
Originally Posted by ramsbruce
First let me say that it's only your opinion that it was Bruce's fault, it's not a fact, and yet you present your opinion as fact. :x
He still had 1 year left on his deal here, so yes the Rams did let him go. He wasn't going anywhere if the Rams fulfilled his contract. He already restructured his deal two years ago, and now the Rams ask him to do it again, over 2 million dollars when we are extremely thin at WR as it is. In my opinion that is a horrible business decision. It also seems like a slap in the face to Bruce. Age is just a number, he can still play. I would have no problem cutting him if he couldn't play. The fact is he still can play, and we are extremely thin at WR. I don't think the money Bruce asked for was too much.
Another fact is the Front Office/Staff put us in cap trouble in the first place, not Bruce. The fact that we overpaid for Bennett (and others) sealed Bruce's fate. How is that Bruce's fault?
So you can think it was Bruce's fault and you're entitled to your opinion, but remember that's only your opinion, not a fact.
|
Dude, your just a rabid Bruce fan with biased opinion. He obviously wanted the money, he didnt take what the rams offered $3m a year, 2$m less then what he wanted. If his heart was truly in it,he would say **** it, I'll retire a Ram and that's that. C'mon, do you really think that guy
NEEDS money. It's not like the organization dumped his ass, we well tried to keep him. If you know your Rams history, you'd know that we've been pretty faithful to our players. So don't give me that Bruce biased crap. Open your eyes.
P.S-Nobody said he
couldn't play, the fact of the matter is he's up in age and truthfully isn't worth the money he's getting paid anymore. That is just reality. It's up to you to accept it.