View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old -28-03-2008
r8rh8rmike's Avatar
r8rh8rmike
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Age: 49
Posts: 4,314
Rep Power: 26
r8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant futurer8rh8rmike has a brilliant future
Re: Owners to focus on integrity issues

Quote:
While no action was taken by the committee, it agreed in principle to Goodell's proposal, which included a "whistleblower" provision that would protect anyone reporting illegal activity.
If Goodell thinks it's such a good idea, why doesn't he give Matt Walsh protection now? I wonder how Robert Kraft will vote on this.

Quote:
Ending the forceout rule on receptions and interceptions. Currently, the play stands if a player is forced out of bounds making a catch. If changed, a player must get both feet down in bounds.
I guess this would get rid of any "would the player have come down in bounds" questions, but what happens when a leaping receiver is tackled and run 3 or 4 yards across the field and then out of bounds while still in the air?

Quote:
Banning players from having hair below the name tag on their backs.
Wow, a hair rule? This should go over well with the NFLPA.
Reply With Quote