Thread: Depth Chart
View Single Post
  #36 (permalink)  
Old -28-03-2008
ramsbruce's Avatar
ramsbruce
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Here
Age: 36
Posts: 3,173
Rep Power: 21
ramsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud oframsbruce has much to be proud of
Re: Depth Chart

Quote:
Originally Posted by rams4life88 View Post
Rivalry is not a reason to not sign with a team? I'm not even going to answer that.Nobody said we weren't thin at WR. Look, TekeRam brought up some great points in another thread that basically proves what I've been tryin to say, I don't know what your idea of the Rams doing enough to keep him. We offered him a very decent contract. Pride got in his way,that's not the Ram's fault. I dont care what anyone says. I'm not going to bash your every post just because it's you. I'm just trying to be logical about this particular "discussion".
You really think players care about rivalry when they sign somewhere else? Football is a business for the teams AND the players. You need to look at it from the players side also, not just the teams side.

It doesn't prove anything. It so happens that you and Teke agree on your opinions. r8rh8rmike and I agree about Bruce. There is no right and wrong. There are valid reasons on both sides. Why is that so hard to understand.

You think the Rams offered him enough, again that's your opinion. I don't think they did. You think pride got in his way, you don't know the real reason. None of us know, and unless Ike comes out and says it and the Rams confirm it or vice versa we will never know.

If you want to be logical see that there are valid points to both sides.
Reply With Quote