Quote:
Originally Posted by ramsbruce
You really think players care about rivalry when they sign somewhere else? Football is a business for the teams AND the players. You need to look at it from the players side also, not just the teams side.
It doesn't prove anything. It so happens that you and Teke agree on your opinions. r8rh8rmike and I agree about Bruce. There is no right and wrong. There are valid reasons on both sides. Why is that so hard to understand.
You think the Rams offered him enough, again that's your opinion. I don't think they did. You think pride got in his way, you don't know the real reason. None of us know, and unless Ike comes out and says it and the Rams confirm it or vice versa we will never know.
If you want to be logical see that there are valid points to both sides.
|
"There is no right and wrong." Tell me if Bruce in a Whiners Jersey looks right to you. And yes, it is a business, like you said, for the players as well. That's my entire point to why he left. I keep stressing that he
could have stayed. But he didn't.Again, I like how you intelligently (or not) refuse or avoid answering some of my questions. In all your honesty, what is YOUR idea of "doing enough to keep Bruce". You want to be logical as well. Think about our situation with the cap. He had to be sacrificed, but it's not like the Ram's straight up dumped him on the street. 2M under what he asked SHOULD be enough to keep a player THAT age. That's being loyal. But obviously we had different opinions on what loyalty is.