View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old -06-04-2008
RedArcher7's Avatar
RedArcher7
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 544
Rep Power: 6
RedArcher7 is a jewel in the roughRedArcher7 is a jewel in the roughRedArcher7 is a jewel in the roughRedArcher7 is a jewel in the rough
Re: A Few Quick Points

Quote:
I agree the Rams need to consider drafting a young future QB but why should it be in round 1. T. Brady was not drafted on day one unless you feel we have a Future Hall of Famer in this draft it makes no sense to waste such a high draft pick on a QB.
Tom Brady should be left out of every draft conversation except ones involving flukes. No team plans on drafting a future HOF in the 6th round. If people would have known what Brady was going to turn out to be, he would have been the first overall pick.

Drafting a QB in the 6th makes sense to be the eventual back up, but if you want a starter you have to draft day one. That said we do not need to draft said QB on day one this year.

Bulger is 31, Tom Brady is 30, Peyton Manning, 32, Matt Hasselback, 32, Jake Delhomme, 33, David Garrard, 30... None of these guys are too old, with the exception of the Panthes, none of them will touch a QB in the first day. And I think everyone will agree, Bulger is better than Delhomme and Garrard, and some will agree he's better than Hasselback. If he was a running back he'd be old, since he's not, he's not, get off it.
Reply With Quote