View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old -08-07-2008
KoaKoi's Avatar
KoaKoi
Status: Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 6
KoaKoi is a glorious beacon of lightKoaKoi is a glorious beacon of lightKoaKoi is a glorious beacon of lightKoaKoi is a glorious beacon of lightKoaKoi is a glorious beacon of light
Re: New Rams by the Numbers

I agree that I prefer the WR numbers to be in the 80's. However, I don't feel like they should be restricted to choosing 1 of 10 possible number choices considering how many players each team fields at the position.

let's go thru alternatives:

WR's wearing a number...

in the 90's? nah, that's DL territory.
in the 70's? see above.
in the 60's? can't have the OL get dissed.
in the 50's? could work, but seems funny.
in the 40's? could work, but again seems funny and treading on the Safeties.
in the 30's? eh..., starting to take over the RB area and the numerous secondary positions.
in the 20's? definitely gonna make the rb's confused and hurt their feelings

which leaves 0-20 which is the other number range that WR's commonly use in addition to something in the 80's.

While I prefer in the 80's, there are not enough kickers and qb's to use up all 1- 19. So if they're gonna take any other numbers, i like em taking numbers from the kickers and QB's.
Reply With Quote