View Single Post
  #39 (permalink)  
Old -10-07-2008
HUbison's Avatar
HUbison
Status: Online
Superbowl MVP
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Missouri
Age: 34
Posts: 9,138
Rep Power: 43
HUbison has a reputation beyond reputeHUbison has a reputation beyond reputeHUbison has a reputation beyond reputeHUbison has a reputation beyond reputeHUbison has a reputation beyond reputeHUbison has a reputation beyond reputeHUbison has a reputation beyond reputeHUbison has a reputation beyond reputeHUbison has a reputation beyond reputeHUbison has a reputation beyond reputeHUbison has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Rams to re-locate to L.A. in 7 years...?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoda
Your explanation about this subject sounds like "Corporate America".
The decision makers are Corporate America. A "seat sold" is a "seat sold" regardless of what occupies that seat. What effect does it have on the field? What effect does it have on the butts that DO occupy the seats?

The answer is........who (among the decision makers) cares (as long as the seat is sold on that Sunday). Football is a business and like any business it is run by money, aka revenue, aka "seats sold". And regardless of what anybody in a Che Gueverra t-shirt may say, that's not a bad thing. It goes beyond what we fans have as our priorities, but then again we don't have an ownership investment in the organization.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoda
Just one more reason that L.A. is not suitable for another pro franchise.
Hold the phone! Yoda, are you now saying LA should NOT get a team. Am I going to have to argue FOR SoCal now to keep this discussion going?
__________________
"The greatest evil is conceived and ordered in clean offices, by men with white collars. Hence, my symbol for Hell is the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern." --- C. S. Lewis

"Dr. Lewis, allow me to introduce to you, Mr Shaw & Jay Zygmunt.....oh, I see you've already met." HUbison
Reply With Quote