View Single Post
  #42 (permalink)  
Old -10-07-2008
YodaRam's Avatar
YodaRam
Status: Offline
Made the Ram Roster (just)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Friendswood Texas
Posts: 486
Rep Power: 0
YodaRam is a glorious beacon of lightYodaRam is a glorious beacon of lightYodaRam is a glorious beacon of lightYodaRam is a glorious beacon of lightYodaRam is a glorious beacon of lightYodaRam is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Rams to re-locate to L.A. in 7 years...?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HUbison View Post
The decision makers are Corporate America. A "seat sold" is a "seat sold" regardless of what occupies that seat. What effect does it have on the field? What effect does it have on the butts that DO occupy the seats?

The answer is........who (among the decision makers) cares (as long as the seat is sold on that Sunday). Football is a business and like any business it is run by money, aka revenue, aka "seats sold". And regardless of what anybody in a Che Gueverra t-shirt may say, that's not a bad thing. It goes beyond what we fans have as our priorities, but then again we don't have an ownership investment in the organization. Hold the phone! Yoda, are you now saying LA should NOT get a team. Am I going to have to argue FOR SoCal now to keep this discussion going?
Well, bison, first off, I'm not going to argue with you about sold seats and fan base or "true fans" anymore. You don't get what i'm saying and as i stated before,"I'm beating a dead horse." Believe it or not numbers "can" lie.

And as far as a team for L.A. When did i say that Los Angeles deserved another pro franchise? If i did, point it out for me. Thanks




RAM ON!

Last edited by YodaRam; -10-07-2008 at 09:40 PM.
Reply With Quote