View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old -16-02-2005
r8rh8rmike's Avatar
r8rh8rmike
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Age: 49
Posts: 4,660
Rep Power: 31
r8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond reputer8rh8rmike has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Jackson starter in 2005

Quote:
I think this is in poor taste by Martz and that he should be focusing on improving the piss-poor line and gameplans rather than annointing Jackson before Faulk's contract status is even addressed. It seems to me that they're choosing to back Faulk into a corner on this and I will be very interested to see how it pan's out.
This is what concerns me. If there has been no discussion on making this move, things could get ugly. Sending a message to Faulk this way just doesn't seem right, if that's the case. The Rams don't seem to be very tactful or adept at communication but I'll hope for the best because I think the team still needs Marshall.
Reply With Quote