Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yodude
See what happens when you type before you think?
|
Well, that was certainly necessary. :bored:
The way you posted, it sounded as if you knew what Martz had done - you said if it was a cap issue, Martz should have sat Faulk down in his office and talked about it there. Do we know he didn't do that already? No, we don't. So I guess I'm not seeing your point of saying what Martz should have done while not knowing what he actually did to begin with.
Referring to this as being "underhanded" or a "stab in the back" seems like a fairly big exaggeration to me. It would be a stab in the back if Marshall found out he lost his job this way - the AP report suggests that's not the case. But other than that, I don't think this is as big a mountain as you apparently want to make it out to be, but rather just something else you feel you can harp on him about.