|
Re: SI ranks the Rams as second most dangerous three-WR set in the NFL
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NickSeiler
The Colts having three WRs with 1,000+ yards and 10+ touchdowns each seem to disagree.
Well, depth outside the top three isn't really the point of the article. I agree that we may have more depth, but if you look at the three receivers on top of the depth chart, you have to give the edge (no pun intended) to the Colts on this one.
|
Yea, it's hard to argue with the output up in Indy. And to the extent of the article, I'd have to agree with the 3 receiver idea and to that our 2nd place finish. However, as the writer even alluded to, when considering 4-WR sets, there is no comparison to the Rams, including the Colts.
__________________
"The greatest evil is conceived and ordered in clean offices, by men with white collars. Hence, my symbol for Hell is the offices of a thoroughly nasty business concern." --- C. S. Lewis
"Dr. Lewis, allow me to introduce to you, Mr Shaw & Jay Zygmunt.....oh, I see you've already met." HUbison
|