Thread: SI ranks the Rams as second most dangerous three-WR set in the NFL
View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old -24-06-2005
RamsFanSam's Avatar
RamsFanSam
Status: Online
Pro Bowl Ram
  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Springfield, MO
Age: 46
Posts: 2,228
Rep Power: 21
RamsFanSam has much to be proud ofRamsFanSam has much to be proud ofRamsFanSam has much to be proud ofRamsFanSam has much to be proud ofRamsFanSam has much to be proud ofRamsFanSam has much to be proud ofRamsFanSam has much to be proud ofRamsFanSam has much to be proud ofRamsFanSam has much to be proud ofRamsFanSam has much to be proud of
Re: SI ranks the Rams as second most dangerous three-WR set in the NFL
I agree that there is a huge drop between #2 and #3. And I have to agree with Nick. The Colts did put up better numbers, but some days I would have to give the edge to our boys. The Colts are more consistent, but the Rams seem to explode at random times. This is what makes football so exciting...
My problem is with the Raiders being in the top 5. Maybe I just didn't watch enough of their games, but I wasn't that impressed with what I saw.
__________________
Hey, you young whippersnappers, I am NOT old!!! Now GET OFF MY LAWN!
Reply With Quote