If i want to get to the super bowl, i have to get by the eagles. Why should the rams help them out of their problem? I think the eagles are going to sign peter warrick if and when the bengals let him go for money reasons. The eagles have the most cap available in the nfc (over 10 million) why should they give up quality young players if they can just spend some cash.
Of course, if the eagles would overpay in the sense that we were getting a considerably better corner than we were giving up at reciever, that might be a different story but i just dont see that happening.
Bottom line. Is anyone on this board willing to give up kevin curtis for lito shepard? I certainly am not, even if the eagles would. That helps the eagles more than it helps us which means it doesnt help us get to the superbowl. They are not going to give up a young corner for
dane looker. That leaves mcdonald. I cant see giving him up for matt ware. Is matt ware that much better than anyone we have at this point?
Now, if TO was out and fisher got hurt, it might be desparation for desparation, but for now, i dont see a fit, although i have to admit, this should be a very fun thread and as always, its a terrific post by The Biggest Bison of them All,
ramming speed to all
general counsel