View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old -06-02-2006
AvengerRam's Avatar
AvengerRam
Status: Online
Mild Mannered Mod
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Longwood, Florida
Age: 40
Posts: 9,525
Rep Power: 45
AvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond reputeAvengerRam has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 20 Post-Game Thoughts: ***SUPER BOWL EDITION***

Here's how I evaluate the "controversial" calls:

1. Offensive Interference Against Seattle
That was actually a textbook example of offensive interference. That said, the Refs probably let that kind of thing go at least 50% of the time.

2. Big Ben's Rushing TD
There is no way you could overrule the call by the replay. Too blurry to tell if the ball broke the plane.

3. Holding Call
Again, the replay (they oddly showed only one angle) was inconclusive. Holding is often not called, and its frustrating when it nullifies a big play, but I can't say if it was right or wrong.

4. Hasselbeck Fumble
Overruled, which was the right call.
__________________