Should be the year the Rams draft a QB. 3 years and Bradford has shown **** all.
If they don't, then I will personally help send them back to California. This is a disgrace. No wonder the fans in STL are apathetic.
Printable View
Should be the year the Rams draft a QB. 3 years and Bradford has shown **** all.
If they don't, then I will personally help send them back to California. This is a disgrace. No wonder the fans in STL are apathetic.
Yep, I was disgusted as Peterson ran all over the Rams in the first half ........... I am disgusted as well, bloody Bradford!
Also disgusted and the Rams revolving "open door" O Line allowed multiple hits in Bradford. Yep, disgusted.
Oh that not what your seeing is it ................
we can go on and on about Sam Bradford...
Yea, Bradford has done squat ......................
Yea only 377 yards and 3 TDs today. What a horrible QB.
I know get rid of Bradford how dare he let Peterson run for that 82 yard TD. What a scrub! Letting him once again break that late 4th quarter run. What a useless QB CUT HIM!
In fairness the game was pretty much over when he got those stats. Could be argued that it was garbage time heroics.Quote:
Originally Posted by lostsoul
However, Bradford engineered the last few victories for us. SO its all swings and roundabouts.
In other words...
INCONSISTENCY.
Getting garbage yards when the game is over is no good to anybody.Quote:
Originally Posted by lostsoul
Sam in the first half was woeful. Yes, he can throw a ball when the defense is playing soft, but he cant do it when we need him to at the start of the game.
Furthermore, on the last 2 drives he continuously looked at the bench for direction and failed to convert on 4th down twice. If he is our "franchise" qb, he has to show it.
We cant blame the o-line and wide receivers all the time. Some of it is on Sam.
He needs to read the defense better, step up in the pocket, and get rid of the ball quicker.
The game was not over when he got those stats. There were 12 minutes (ish) in the 4th quarter with the first second half touchdown and 7 minutes with the second. Plenty of time to tie the game with better play over the rest of the quarter by basically the entire team.
dude, the rams could have won the game at the end, yea it's a loss but he could have led the comeback and you wouldn't be talkingQuote:
Originally Posted by Action_Jackson
he was about 40 yards short, but the loss isn't on bradford, the plays called on the fourth downs puzzled me
Game wasn't over they had a chance at the end.
Who are half these posters anyway? We never see them except when we lose.
Interesting.
Actually, it was the officials that let AP run for those two 82 yard running plays.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jockelite
They called back a SJax run that had a LOT LESS holding than the two AP runs had.
It sure would be nice if the officials could help the RAMS as much as they help their opponents. At least 10 points in this game were all officials. The RAMS would have still lost, but AP would have 82 less yards on his stat sheet.
gap
Vikes were pretty much just defending their lead. Played soft coverage (bend and don't break) to prevent the big play, and thereby chew up the clock with short to just about mid range check down completions.Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokenWing
And when we somehow got back close then there went the accuracy again.