Results 76 to 82 of 82
-
-04-30-2011 #76
Re: With the 78th pick of the 2011 Draft, the Rams take Austin Pettis, WR, Boise Stat
I don't like us addressing the Wr issue in the draft. We already have enough young talent, we need a veteran WR. Hate these last picks.
-
-05-01-2011 #77
Re: With the 78th pick of the 2011 Draft, the Rams take Austin Pettis, WR, Boise Stat
Good, optimistic view on our 3rd round pick, SJacksonrules. I share it even without knowing that much about this rookie (although that is great video material). I like this selection. Again, it brings my optimism up on the Rams offense plans with Bradford.I can't think of Pettis without thinking he will be a Sidney Rice and Vincent Jackson type guy. Just catching touchdown after touchdown. I think this guy will have double digit TD's next year; watch for it. Dreaming big but you have to when Sammy B is at QB.

-
-05-03-2011 #78
Re: With the 78th pick of the 2011 Draft, the Rams take Austin Pettis, WR, Boise Stat
And I guess these people, by virtue of their positions are the only ones qualified to have an opinion on the subject? I don't think so.
I realize that Fendi Onobun is a very fast TE. So picking Kendricks in the 2nd round is still a questionable pick, so I am questioning it.
Same goes for Austin Pettis in the 3rd round and I am questioning his selection as well.
Is there a problem?
And since you asked, yes I have been a coach before, but that has absolutely nothing to do with my opinion on these picks.Last edited by Fortuninerhater; -05-03-2011 at 02:51 AM.
-
-05-03-2011 #79
Re: With the 78th pick of the 2011 Draft, the Rams take Austin Pettis, WR, Boise Stat
No, it means that they are MORE qualified.
Fendi is pretty darn raw. Kendricks has a lot more experience.I realize that Fendi Onobun is a very fast TE. So picking Kendricks in the 2nd round is still a questionable pick, so I am questioning it.
You can question all you want, but you might be better served to consider the reasoning behind the pick.Same goes for Austin Pettis in the 3rd round and I am questioning his selection as well.
You've been an NFL coach? I seriously doubt that (and, no, I'm not interested in whether you were the assistant defensive coordinator for some High School team).And since you asked, yes I have been a coach before, but that has absolutely nothing to do with my opinion on these picks.
Welcome to the St. Louis Rams!
-
-05-05-2011 #80
Re: With the 78th pick of the 2011 Draft, the Rams take Austin Pettis, WR, Boise Stat
Last edited by Fortuninerhater; -05-05-2011 at 02:06 AM. Reason: I have 3 responses that are inside Avenger's quotes
-
-05-07-2011 #81
Re: With the 78th pick of the 2011 Draft, the Rams take Austin Pettis, WR, Boise Stat
I think the Rams are making a point of drafting WR's that are smart, sure handed, productive college players. Opposed to faster players with a lot more question marks but higher upsides IF they pan out. I think they have played it safe considering the lockout and all. I think the recieving core had enough ??? as it was.
The whole receiving core apart from the rookies just drafted have either mental issues regarding the playbook or are coming off major surgeries. These new players drafted may not have the huge No.1 upsides at WR but it doesnt mean to say they cant do a great job. Remember this McD offense doesnt need a true 1 or 2 receiver because the ball is spread about so much to keep the defense's guessing.
-
-05-07-2011 #82
Re: With the 78th pick of the 2011 Draft, the Rams take Austin Pettis, WR, Boise Stat
I understand all of what you're saying, but that is not why I'm questioning the picks. I am questioning them because in my eyes, we had (several) far greater needs to fill.
A better strategy in my opinion would have been to continue to develop current TEs, and sign, trade for, or draft a number one caliber WR. Since Jones and Green went early, my focus would've then shifted to signing a number one caliber receiver, or even one or two of those sure-handed, good route running receivers we supposedly got in Pettis and Salas, in free agency, whenever free agency happened.
Last resort would've been some sort of trade for a number one caliber WR if a golden opportunity presented itself, but honestly I think we would be better served to just stand pat with what we already have for one more year, and hope that all the injured WRs came back this year and made a huge impact if we can't sign a FA.
Had we had that mindset, perhaps we could've addressed what I believe to be far greater needs than a 2nd round TE.
We're still playing Russian-roulette at RB, with Jackson among the leaders in carries every year. The middle of the D-line is either old or simply in need of upgrading. Still need a starting OLB. Still need better interior linemen. All of these are far greater needs IMO, but what do I know?Last edited by Fortuninerhater; -05-07-2011 at 03:13 PM.
Similar Threads
-
With the 14th pick in the 2011 Draft, the Rams select Robert Quinn, DE, UNC
By Nick in forum RAM TALKReplies: 93Last Post: -05-10-2011, 04:02 AM -
With the 47th pick of the 2011 Draft, the Rams take Lance Kendricks, TE, Wisconsin
By Nick in forum RAM TALKReplies: 88Last Post: -05-07-2011, 12:16 PM -
Who WILL be the Rams' first pick in the 2011 draft?
By AvengerRam in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 21Last Post: -03-16-2011, 01:55 PM -
With the 14th overall pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the St. Louis Rams select:
By THOLTFAN81 in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 20Last Post: -03-02-2011, 04:43 AM -
The Rams should try to trade their first pick - in the 2011 draft.
By AvengerRam in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 27Last Post: -02-18-2010, 05:40 PM




13Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks