ARCH ENEMIES (Week 1): Carolina Panthers

[Panthro]

You don't bring in David Carr if Delhomme has "a proven track record of winning" ...

You want to tell me it was Delhomme's play that carried Carolina to the Super Bowl?

I'll give you 2 reasons for bringing in Carr you can understand....Jamie Martin and Ryan Fitzpatrick

[RamsInfiniti]

What does Ryan Fitzpatrick have to do with your failures at QB? He doesn't play for the Panthers or Rams ...

[RamsInfiniti]

Nor does Jamie Martin!

[Panthro]

Because they were your crap ass back ups when Bulger went down....Sorry to use them as an example. I thought that would have helped explain why Carr's here.

[r8rh8rmike]

I was hoping subtly would suffice

Sounds more like you were hoping to have it both ways. It's true Jake has been a winner in the past, but it's also true that he has not been a model of consistency, especially when faced with a little adversity. Time will tell if he can hold off David Carr.

[RamsInfiniti]

Carr's there because Delhomme is average ....

But then again, I'd take my backup QB over as my started over any QB on your roster ...

[RamsInfiniti]

I'm sorry, I'll stop now. I forgot to take into account all that frustration you must be dealing with from being the MOST DISSAPOINTING team in the NFL last season ...

[Panthro]

Sounds more like you were hoping to have it both ways. It's true Jake has been a winner in the past, but it's also true that he has not been a model of consistency, especially when faced with a little adversity. Time will tell if he can hold off David Carr.

If Jake could spell consistency let alone be consistent I would be a happy fan....I am putting alot of stock in the new OC and time will tell

[Panthro]

I'm sorry, I'll stop now. I forgot to take into account all that frustration you must be dealing with from being the MOST DISSAPOINTING team in the NFL last season ...

It was pretty rough with all the expectations and everything....It's never good when Prisco starts backing us.

[Krames41]

As of today... steve smith is a bigger playmaker.... the guy made the mighty bears "d" of 05' look like fools single handed.... he had 10 catchs for 245 yds and 3 tds...

Torry Holt 2006 (while playing hurt): 93 Receptions, 1188 yards, 10 touchdowns

Steve Smith 2006 (while playing healthy): 83 Receptions, 1,166 yards, 7 touchdowns

You sure you want to make that argument because Holt has Smith beat in every category. You want to compare career numbers now because that's even worse? And again, Torry Holt had to have shoulder suregery this off season because he was playing hurt. An unhealthy, older, Torry Holt beats a younger, healthy Steve Smith. Don't ever make the argument Steve Smith is better ever again becasue you sound stupid. By the way, our running back had more receptions then Steve Smith. Choke that one down sally.


I'm Jeff Kramer and I believe....

[Panthro]

Torry Holt 2006 (while playing hurt): 93 Receptions, 1188 yards, 10 touchdowns

Steve Smith 2006 (while playing healthy): 83 Receptions, 1,166 yards, 7 touchdowns

I am an NC State guy and have argued the Holt vs Smith argument before in defense of Holt.....but please do just a little bit of research the next time instead of just looking at the stat line. How about 2006 games played.....

Torry Holt - 16
Steve Smith - 14

Choke that one down Samantha

[RamsInfiniti]

Ah ha! I finally figured out why Panthro is trolling over here. Check out these comments from the Panthers Board:

Brilliant Quote from Panthro: "I really think the injuries and age of the rams WR's will allow Jake to create havoc on the the Rams DB's"

Quotes about Panthro from others: " Don't pay attention to Panthro. No one ever does."

Panthro says "I'm leaving for another 4 days". Another poster says "Good riddance!"

I can tell you are well-respected at your home forum.

[AvengerRam]

Smith and Holt are both great players.

Where Panther fans miss the boat is underestimating Isaac Bruce (calling him an old man, and such). Take a moment to look up his stats from last year.

[Krames41]

I am an NC State guy and have argued the Holt vs Smith argument before in defense of Holt.....but please do just a little bit of research the next time instead of just looking at the stat line. How about 2006 games played.....

Torry Holt - 16
Steve Smith - 14

Choke that one down Samantha

Wow, you just proved that Torry Holt also stays healthier. You want to go into who is more injury proned now? Thanks for proving my point. Choke another one down because you just got beat again Sally.


I'm Jeff Kramer and I Believe....

[Panthro]

Ah ha! I finally figured out why Panthro is trolling over here. Check out these comments from the Panthers Board:

Brilliant Quote from Panthro: "I really think the injuries and age of the rams WR's will allow Jake to create havoc on the the Rams DB's"

Quotes about Panthro from others: " Don't pay attention to Panthro. No one ever does."

Panthro says "I'm leaving for another 4 days". Another poster says "Good riddance!"

I can tell you are well-respected at your home forum.

lol

I mistyped that post in who would have a better game Delhomme vs Bulger thread.....
and edited it with
"Wowsers....well I missed out on the middle part of what I wanted to say

And the crappiness of their DB's"

And as far as them insulting me....such is the territory when you are Panthro.