Az Hakim

***DJRamFan*** · -11-28-2001

Az is a speedy receiver and returner, but has an EXTREMELY high fumble ratio (i believe 7 out of 100 catches or something like that). Should the Rams spend a lot of time and money to keep him in St. Louis??

***schanz*** · -11-28-2001

No, I don't think so. I think they should concentrate on a better running game via the OL and the defensive line.
Az is like a thoroughbred race horse. Fast and fun to watch but will break down with one bad stumble.

***Aries51*** · -11-28-2001

Yes,I think the Rams need to keep him,but I dont think Az is worth a God awful amount of money either.I think our no.1 priority should be signing Fletcher.He has been a huge part of our improved defense this year.Lovie Smith has brought out the best in him.We should also make sure Little sticks around.

:angryram: GO RAMS! STAY FOCUSED! WIN!:shield:

***RAMble On*** · -11-29-2001

The best case scenario would be to sign Fletch, Little and Az. It would be great to have all three again next year. I do think it is more critical to have Little and Fletch over Az.

Tough one to just say yes or no…... With Proel possibly retiring next year, I will go with yes....but not for a ton of money.

***MsWistRAM*** · -11-29-2001

Love the spinning ball, Ramble. Can we do the bob 'n weave around it?

I love Az, I do, but some of those mistakes have been costly. I think it would be money better spent elsewhere.

***DJRamFan*** · -11-30-2001

Originally posted by MsWistRAM
I love Az, I do, but some of those mistakes have been costly. I think it would be money better spent elsewhere.

i was saving my opinion, but I agree...i say draft a rookie high that can hold onto the ball.

***sprtsmac*** · -11-30-2001

I'm with a lot of people on this. I say yes, as long as its not going to cost a lot. If he wants to be paid like a number 2 or 1 receiver....then no. Use the money on Fletcher. Then go get us another number 3 and a DE. Either thru the draft or free agency.