throwback week



Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Baker

  1. #1
    Sanantonioram Guest

    Unhappy Baker

    I'm not sure who would be directly responsible for this, but, if we didn't even make an offer to Baker after bringing him in for an interview, it sounds a lot like the old front office. The guy said he wanted to be a Ram and he was the best punter in the NFC last year. We don't even make him an offer that he can turn down???? I don't like the way this went down at all!!!:tut


  2. #2
    realchamp11 Guest

    Re: Baker

    Me either

    :1:

  3. #3
    Scidog68 Guest

    Re: Baker

    He said the Rams mentioned an offer "near 600,000/year"; he sought near a mil. a year.

    Obviously Baker was not worth haggling for in the FO's eyes. Knowing the difference between Baker's average and Turk's average, can't say I blame them much. It's not like Baker has been a perpetual pro-Bowler.

    Punter was a need, but perhaps not one with great "value" FA's available, hmmmmm? Maybe they didn't like him after all.

  4. #4
    RAMMAN68's Avatar
    RAMMAN68 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Age
    46
    Posts
    2,714
    Rep Power
    15

    Re: Baker

    I would hope that they may be looking at one in the draft, and signed Turk as a back up if things fall through.
    JUST WIN ONE FOR THE FANS


    "HIT HARD, HIT FAST, AND HIT OFTEN"
    Adm. William "Bull" Halsey

  5. #5
    ZigZagRam's Avatar
    ZigZagRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    St. Louis
    Age
    29
    Posts
    1,700
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: Baker

    I'm not sure who would be directly responsible for this, but, if we didn't even make an offer to Baker after bringing him in for an interview, it sounds a lot like the old front office.
    I don't think three big free agent signings on the defensive side sounds like the old front office way of doing things.

    Clearly the Rams didn't want to waste their time with a punter who more than likely wouldn't settle for anything less than $1M.

  6. #6
    general counsel's Avatar
    general counsel is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    atlanta, georgia
    Age
    52
    Posts
    5,695
    Rep Power
    83

    Re: Baker

    What does "he wanted to be a ram" mean to you. He wants to be whoever will pay him the money he wants. He will say the same thing the next place he visits.

    It would be so nice if some people would give the front office some credit rathering than hammering away on every single decision, especially those that are very salary cap driven. There is a basic tenent of negotiation that says why waste your time when the parties are so far apart. It CAN hurt to make an offensive offer, it happens all the time in business. People have reputations and credibility to consider.

    Go to a flea market some time and find something priced at $1000 on someones table. If you offer them $25 for it, do you think that they are going to take you seriously as a business person? That is what the nfl or any other ongoing business relationship is about. Its about reputation.

    If you are not in the same ballpark with an agent and player, fine, no reason to negotiate. But the agent doesnt come to the conclusion that the rams are only good for making low ball offers. Rather, he knows that if the rams really want a guy and think that they can make a reasonable offer they will do so. This is basic business, it really has nothing to do with football.

    The guy led the nfc one year. He is not ray guy.

    ramming speed to all

    general counsel


  7. #7
    AvengerRam's Avatar
    AvengerRam is online now Moderator Emeritus
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Longwood, Florida, United States
    Age
    46
    Posts
    19,041
    Rep Power
    171

    Re: Baker

    The guy has played for five teams in five years. Maybe there's a reason for that.

  8. #8
    RamsFan16 Guest

    Re: Baker

    I think we should have still made an offer. Its worth it!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •