Results 61 to 75 of 78
-
-09-15-2012 #61
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
Now THAT guy could really throw a Hail Mary!
Originally Posted by Sosa
"Before the gates of excellence the high gods have placed sweat; long is the road thereto and rough and steep at first; but when the heights are reached, then there is ease, though grievously hard in the winning." --- Hesiod
-
-09-15-2012 #62
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
This is what separates the rams from franchises like the steelers. They build through the draft. secure that talent for awhile and let them go to have the next guys step in. They give their players the time to develop. With the Rams, if you arent great from day one your expendable. There has to be some continuation for this team in order to build a foundation for a consistent winner in this league. You already have the qb you paid for, now surround him with talent enough to succeed then judge him. Get off the RG3 bandwagon, unless your a redskins fan...
-
-09-15-2012 #63
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
Can I just remind everyone who thinks RG3 is the best thing since slice bread that they were playing the Saints. A team without a head coach AND more importantly, a coaching staff that has Spags in it. As Rams fans, we all know that Spags gets out-coached weekly. I don't give RG3 and the redskins any credit, I give all the credit to Spags...if there is one thing he knows how to do, is make sure you are not in a position to win.
-
-09-15-2012 #64
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
-
-09-15-2012 #65
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
The Rams did the right thing. The only way it will be the wrong move is if Bradford doesn't become an elite QB and RG3 does. I think Bradford will be a very good QB for many years.
-
-09-15-2012 #66
-
-09-15-2012 #67
-
-09-15-2012 #68
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
Wrong. You can't evaluate the trade merely by looking at Bradford and RGIII.
The Rams have already obtained Michael Brockers, Janoris Jenkins, Isaiah Pead and Rokevious Watkins as a direct result of the trade. They will obtain two more players from the Redskins 2013 and 2014 first round picks.
If those six players help the Rams become a contender, then the trade will have been a success for the Rams, regardless of any Bradford/RGIII comparison.
Welcome to the St. Louis Rams!
-
-09-15-2012 #69
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
I listened to it live on "The Fast Lane" and man I love Kurt. I was happy to hear him say those things about Bradford. I certainly hope Bradford is the least of our worries.
Thinking of Kurt also reminds me that QBs can have down years too and return to greatness. Everyone thought Kurt was out for the count after St. Louis, but he bounced back in a big way. With Bradford it was just worrying seeing him hit a brick wall (almost literally) in year 2. Bradford says all the right things and everyone says he is very intelligent, and those are great things. At the same time, he seems to be nagged by bad habits we all see. I have ragged on Bradford too much this weekend, I try too hard sometimes to be the devils advocate. I am not THAT worried about Bradford.
-
-09-16-2012 #70
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
The Rams brass will have their own view on Bradford and his future with the Rams after this season. I don't buy into many of the arguements posted here about judging Bradford on who he has and hasn't played with. Players can show leadership and physical skills no matter who they play with. I think it matters having a different OC every year. That's huge. At any rate the current staff will do what's right for the Rams and if they think Bradford is still the guy after this season then he'll be the guy. If they don't think Bradford is the guy then he'll be gone. It's up to them not us. The'll have a pretty good handle on the Bradford situation by the end of the year.

-
-09-16-2012 #71
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
It's a QB driven league - plain and simple. All those pieces maybe great, but you need a top flight QB to win the Super Bowl. SO if all those players all turn out to be great, smart money says they still won't make a serious run at a SB without a very good QB.
But the fact they did obtain all those players is a very good thing. Unfortunately, the Rams draft track record has been very poor. Maybe Fisher will help.
-
-09-16-2012 #72
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
Bradford has a six year deal... he's played only two years of the six, he's in year three. He is not close to being cut loose, even if he has another season like last year.
Bradford's contract. He is still scheduled to earn $9 million in base salary in 2013, $8 million of which is guaranteed, $14.015 million in 2014 and $12.985 million in 2015. Up to $800,000 in escalators are available in each remaining year of the contract with $2 million available in total incentives.
-
-09-16-2012 #73
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
Well, it certainly helps, but I don't think Big Ben was top flight the first time the Steelers won one with him behind center in 2005, nor was Eli considered top flight in the 2007 season. If you go back ten years, you've got Brad Johnson winning one with Tampa. The general trend there would seem to be that the surest way to win a Super Bowl is to have an elite pocket passer like New England, Indianapolis, Green Bay, New Orleans, and debatable the most recent wins by Pittsburgh and New York. However, we've also seen quite a few teams play in the championship game in recent years with just an above average--but not top flight--quarterback and a strong defense.
And let's just say that hypothetically, Sam Bradford doesn't pan out, but next year or the year after we draft a different franchise quarterback with one of the picks we got from the Redskins and still have a better supporting cast because of the trade than we would have had for RGIII. Wouldn't the trade still have worked out to our advantage in that scenario? Basically, the only way it isn't a good move for us is if RGIII turns out to be a top five quarterback for the next decade and even with the extra picks, the Rams still can't manage to build a contender.
-
-09-16-2012 #74
-
-09-16-2012 #75
Re: Bernie: Giving up on Bradford for Griffin would have been wrong move ..
I agree Av.
If RG3 turns out to be elite he still is not going to win a SB on his own he needs pro bowlers around him, without top draft picks until 2015 that could be an issue.Top flight QB to win the Super Bowl. SO if all those players all turn out to be great, smart money says they still won't make a serious run at a SB without a very good QB.
If we hit on those picks and or leverage them to always be in position to upgrade our roster we will be in a better position.
If Bradford does not workout and the picks do, all we need is add that one player, If RG3 does not workout for whatever reason, the skins are going to be up a creek. Adding talent through FA is not cheap.
Bradford will work out and it's going to be nice to add two first rounders over the next two years to make sure he does!
Similar Threads
-
Here's to Robert Griffin III....
By ZiaRam in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 16Last Post: -02-27-2012, 01:42 AM -
Bernie: Rams Get Ready To Move When Labor Peace Arrives In The NFL
By r8rh8rmike in forum RAM TALKReplies: 4Last Post: -07-19-2011, 01:44 AM -
Mood of Rams Fans: Is Bernie Right or Wrong?
By AvengerRam in forum RAM TALKReplies: 27Last Post: -04-22-2010, 04:50 PM -
Everson Griffin Opposite Chris Long
By Bralidore(RAMMODE) in forum DRAFT & FAReplies: 2Last Post: -12-28-2009, 05:51 PM




36Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote






Bookmarks