Results 1 to 2 of 2
Big Stars Are Failing the St. Louis Rams
By Bernie Miklasz
Considering the huge financial investments the Rams have made in their contracts, running back Steven Jackson and quarterback Marc Bulger continue to come up short with the game on the line.
They are supposed to be two of the Ramsí key franchises pieces, right?
Then again, maybe that explains why the team is 2-12 this season and has the leagueís worst record (5-25) since the beginning of the 2007 season.
The Rams have suffered three close losses this season, going down by 7 points at New England, 4 points to Miami, and 3 points on Sunday to Seattle.
Obviously victories were there, waiting to be claimed. The winning QBs make plays to get that done. Itís not an easy job, but thatís why many veteran starting QBs make the big money. Bulger included.
And hereís what Bulger has done in the second half of the three narrow losses:
That computes to a quarterback rating of 36.1
In the fourth quarter of those losses, itís even worse. Bulger has connected on only 17 of 37 passes (45.9 %) for 131 yards and three INTs with no TDs for a passer rating of 21.3.
Thatís right: a QB rating of 21.3 when itís late and close and tight.
Thatís remarkably poor. I donít know what else to say. Bulger hasnít had the best protection or receivers or rushing attack or game plans, but the Rams had a chance to win all three games, and that usually comes down to your top guns making plays, making the save. And Bulger hasnít delivered. (I should also point out that the pass rush wasnít an issue in the Miami and Seattle losses; Bulger had time to deal).
Sunday against the Seahawks, the Rams were protecting a 20-13 lead and had two late possessions that could have sealed a victory. But the Rams offense couldnít stay on the field. On the next-to-last drive, Bulger needed 9 yards on third down and threw a 7-yard pass to the tight end. Whatís the point of that? After the punt the Seahawks drove for the tying (20-20) TD. Then on the final series, Bulger went back to pass three times, and all three throws failed to connect. After the punt, Seattle scooted downfield for the winning FG. With the game on the line, No. 2 Seattle QB Seneca Wallace made plays for his team. Wallace isnít making Bulger money, but he made money plays late Sunday afternoon.
Now, onto JacksonÖ
A trend has emerged over the last two seasons, and especially this season:
When in the lineup, Jackson starts fast, but he isnít a finisher.
Since the start of the 2007 season, Jackson has 1,170 yards rushing in the first half and 606 yards rushing in the second half of games. Now to be fair to Jackson, those numbers are misleading on the surface because the Rams have trailed in so many games. They must throw the ball in the second half. But that said, heís averaging 4.6 yards per carry in the first half, and 3.4 yards per carry in the second half.
This season, Jackson has rushed 118 times for 502 yards in the first half (4.2 per rush). And he has 74 carries for 272 yards (3.6 per rush) in the second half.
Itís more glaring in the fourth quarter of games this season; Jackson has 75 yards on 27 rushes for an average of only 2.7 yards per carry. Wow.
The real conversation starter is this: will Jackson ever be able to hold up as a feature back?
Can he go strong to the finish line?
Or will he continue to crawl to the finish line?
The Rams last two home losses were close. The 16-12 loss to the Dolphins and the 23-20 setback to the Seahawks were crying out for a Ramsí leader to take charge. Jackson is supposed to be a game-changing, franchise-altering back. A dominator. But against the Dolphins and Seahawks, Jackson faded in the fourth quarter.
Against Miami, though Jackson rushed for 94 yards overall, he had one fourth-quarter carry.
Against Seattle, though Jackson rushed for 91 yards overall, he had 4 carries for 5 yards in the fourth quarter.
In the Miami game, Jackson either pulled himself from the game (coach Jim Haslettís original version) or was pulled from the game by the coaches (Jacksonís version) due to lingering stiffness from a thigh injury. To this day, the reason for Jackson being on the sideline still isnít clear. No one will say whether he begged out, or if the coaches yanked him as a precautionary measure.
Sunday against Seattle, Haslett described Jackson as ďlightheadedĒ late in the game. Haslett said the doctors told him that Jackson wasnít cleared to play. Thatís why Jackson wasnít on the field for the first two plays of the Ramsí final possession when the Rams had a chance to put the Seahawks away. He entered on third down, to serve as a decoy. But the Rams went 3-and-out and punted. Jackson hinted after the game that he wanted to be on the field but wasnít allowed to enter the game.
I donít doubt that Jackson wants to play.
But again, this comes down to durability and stamina.
The great backs are as strong, fresh and effective in the fourth quarter as they are in the first quarter. Some of the Hall of Fame RBs even seemed to get better as the game went on; Walter Payton and Emmitt Smith come to mind.
Jackson is a very talented back. But this is his fifth NFL season, and Jackson is already into his second big contract. The Rams are still waiting for him to be the kind of back who takes over games, and Jackson still isnít close to making that happen.
Re: Big Stars Are Failing the St. Louis Rams
Do we even have a 2 minute offense?!
By OldRamsfan in forum RAM TALKReplies: 29Last Post: -03-16-2009, 10:23 PM
By RamWraith in forum RAM TALKReplies: 1Last Post: -09-08-2008, 08:23 AM
By RamWraith in forum RAM TALKReplies: 5Last Post: -01-17-2008, 03:29 PM
By RamWraith in forum RAM TALKReplies: 0Last Post: -10-30-2007, 08:58 PM
By RamWraith in forum RAM TALKReplies: 5Last Post: -09-19-2007, 01:06 PM