Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27
  1. #16
    RealRam's Avatar
    RealRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    8,222
    Rep Power
    68

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    Agreed. No doubt Suh is making a name for himself and developing fast; he is on his way to being Stud Suh.

    I too was in favor of this DT weeks before the draft. Then I began to lean towards Bradford. I went back to favoring NS, ended up atop the fence days before D-day and now, I'm just so glad the Rams selected SB!

    Bradford is clearly proving to be the biggest impact player of the two and, barring injury to either, will continue as such.

    Last edited by RealRam; -11-02-2010 at 01:19 PM. Reason: Helmet


  2. #17
    jmk321's Avatar
    jmk321 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    albany
    Posts
    591
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    Quote Originally Posted by RebelYell View Post
    Suh gets sacks. That's where he excels. McCoy is a fun stuffer. You'll never get the recognition you deserve as a premier run stuffer because it doesn't make the highlight reals.

    I was in favor of Bradford from the very beginning but Suh has far outperformed what I feared he would become. So often, speed rushers in college from the DT position become worthless in college because their speed becomes something NFL quality guards can counter. SUH is FAR more dominant than I ever expected.
    I'm pretty sure you meant run there. Just a typo. But it's funny that you should say that because right now the Bucs have the 3rd worst run defense in the NFL and give up the most yards per carry. Suh is just far superior than McCoy. It's really not even close.

    I'm not sure where this Suh hate from some people in this thread is coming from. Suh is a dominant and mean D Tackle and it appears that both the Rams and the Lions made the right pick. If people aren't liking him for dancing into the endzone then you probably don't like the majority of NFL players because tons of guys do that when they get an easy score. Especially when they are on defense because those chances are rare. It's just weird to pick out one guy to not like because of that.

  3. #18
    RamsInfiniti's Avatar
    RamsInfiniti is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    R.I.P.
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,743
    Rep Power
    77

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    No hate for Suh, we've just proven we can be a top tier defense without this guy ....

  4. #19
    jmk321's Avatar
    jmk321 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    albany
    Posts
    591
    Rep Power
    14

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    Quote Originally Posted by RamsInfiniti View Post
    No hate for Suh, we've just proven we can be a top tier defense without this guy ....
    I understood what you were saying. Clearly that is true. Other people were just acting like even if the Rams could get him now that they wouldn't want him.

  5. #20
    RamsInfiniti's Avatar
    RamsInfiniti is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    R.I.P.
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,743
    Rep Power
    77

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    Quote Originally Posted by jmk321 View Post
    I understood what you were saying. Clearly that is true. Other people were just acting like even if the Rams could get him now that they wouldn't want him.
    Good gosh, if we did have Suh for passing downs, I would venture to believe Long would have 10-12 sacks already. How many has he just barely missed this year with the QB stepping up in the pocket?

  6. #21
    AlphaRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    a
    Posts
    2,521
    Rep Power
    74

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    Bradford has done more for our defense than what Suh ever would have done. How? He hasn't left them on the field all day like what happened last year...and the year before....and the year before....

    Sure, we had some times this season that they were left on the field. However, we are quite devoid of WR talent.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #22
    BEER's Avatar
    BEER is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    ca
    Posts
    896
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    Wish we could have got both.

  8. #23
    lordwhttgr's Avatar
    lordwhttgr is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    I live in Danville Illinois, I work all over the USA.
    Posts
    759
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    Quote Originally Posted by jmk321 View Post
    I understood what you were saying. Clearly that is true. Other people were just acting like even if the Rams could get him now that they wouldn't want him.
    Wow,,,don't get me wrong Suh is a D player. But is you compare the two Bradford is a better fit in this team than Suh. I would add Suh to this team, I just would not have him over Bradford at this point.

  9. #24
    C-Mob 71's Avatar
    C-Mob 71 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    S. Illinois
    Posts
    1,506
    Rep Power
    45

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    Suh is someone who you hate when he is against you, but love when he is on your team. I merely "hate" him because he seems like a cocky jerk. Of course if he was a Ram, I would say he is confident and doesn't take crap from anyone. Perception does wonders.

  10. #25
    svh01 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    202
    Rep Power
    7

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    Quote Originally Posted by tomahawk247 View Post
    Question you have to ask: how many games would the Rams have won this year if they had taken Suh over Bradford.

    I can pretty much guarantee it's less than the 4 we have won already.
    Hard to say that. If we took off an addition 3 or 4 yrds on our rush ave and gave up 3 less pts, we still could have won 4 games. Plus don't forget, by adding more pressure on the QB he could have caused more turnovers and better field position for the offense. Our D is more talented than the Lions, Suh could have made us an elite D.

  11. #26
    Sammy Ocho Bradford is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    93
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    Suh almost made himself look like a complete ass on that fumble recovery TD.

    Lucky for him Santana didn't connect on that swipe.

    Its a QB driven league, and we may have struck the jackpot, there are only two "immortal" QB's in the league right now, lets hope we landed the next.

    No thanks on Suh.

  12. #27
    sjacksonrules's Avatar
    sjacksonrules is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    southern il
    Posts
    1,450
    Rep Power
    29

    Re: Bradford vs. Suh

    I am with C-mob on this one. I hate his attitude on the touchdown. He very well could of pulled a leon lett. I am so glad we chose Sammy B. A Arizona fan friend of mine said he would offer a first rounder for sam. I respectfully declined lol.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Bradford Settling In (N. Wagoner)
    By RealRam in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: -08-16-2010, 09:57 AM
  2. Ramsí Bradford prepares for first big test
    By RockinRam in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: -08-14-2010, 12:21 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: -04-25-2010, 01:16 AM
  4. Replies: 24
    Last Post: -04-19-2010, 08:18 PM
  5. Replies: 12
    Last Post: -04-19-2010, 12:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •