Carriker best game at 3 technique
Jim Haslet even stated that Carriker had his best game of the season at the 3 technique Sunday vs. the Cards. Clifton Ryan has proven so far that he could be a great NT. Glover is getting old and isn't the player he used to be and Wrotten can't stay off the bong. What does everyone think about Ryan at NT and Carriker at UT maybe not now, but in the near future.
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
At this point of the season (0-5) almost any change sounds good.
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
I agree. Start Carriker AND Ryan! Ryan has been disruptive whenever he's played.
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
I would not mind seeing AC at DE, with Wroten DT and Ryan at NT. Hall has no sacks.
Ramfan Kobe is all but out of LA, yes!
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
Sounds good to me.
I must say though that I did get a chuckle out of "...can't stay off the bong...".:)
Don't ask me why, but I'm still laughing about it. Some things just tickle I guess..................
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
Quote:
Originally Posted by
39thebeast
What does everyone think about Ryan at NT and Carriker at UT maybe not now, but in the near future.
Haslett seems to like that possibility...
http://www.clanram.com/forums/f11/nt-ryan-ut-carriker-our-future-starters-haslett-hopes-so-26638/
Personally I think we need to put the best two guys on the field. If that's Ryan @ NT and Carriker @ UT, so be it. Whatever works.
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
We're 0-5, why not try anything under the sun? Why not try some 3-4 with AC, Ryan, Wroten on the line and Little, Spoon, Pisa, and Chillar the LB's?
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
Right now I like how they are using Ryan. Honestly I think he's been disruptive because he is in a backup role. I've never been a fan of rookies starting on the deffensive line because it does take a lot of endurance and most rookies just dont have that at this point.
I would like to see a regular change up with Wroten and Ryan both getting more playing time. Glover is getting older (as stated many times) and would probably play better with a reduced role
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TekeRam
We're 0-5, why not try anything under the sun? Why not try some 3-4 with AC, Ryan, Wroten on the line and Little, Spoon, Pisa, and Chillar the LB's?
Because you want to eventually win, and your best chance of winning comes from what you've been practicing for months rather than completely changing to something new we haven't practiced.
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
Still pretty ticked at Wroten letting the Rams down. All I can say he had better for the next 5 games make All-Star highlight films. Personally if I was HC he would have been on the sidelines during those 5 games as WATER/TOWL BOY
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rambos
I would not mind seeing AC at DE, with Wroten DT and Ryan at NT. Hall has no sacks.
Ramfan Kobe is all but out of LA, yes!
actually Hall got a sack against SF. Little doesnt have any sacks though, do you fancy dropping him?
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rambos
I would not mind seeing AC at DE, with Wroten DT and Ryan at NT. Hall has no sacks.
Ramfan Kobe is all but out of LA, yes!
I hear what you're saying, but the problem is a 4-3 DE has to be an edge rusher. At 315, I'm not sure Carriker has the mobility to stretch the edge blocking.
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
I think next year we'll be looking at Ryan at NT, Carriker at UT, a Blue Chip rookie at DE and Little/Hall on the other side.
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
Quote:
Originally Posted by
AvengerRam
I think next year we'll be looking at Ryan at NT, Carriker at UT, a Blue Chip rookie at DE and Little/Hall on the other side.
Quite possible. In that same vein, Scott Wright's site has us taking Campbell at #3, and the Jets taking Long a few picks later. When it's all said and done, surely we've got a crack at one of them.
Re: Carriker best game at 3 technique
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HUbison
Quite possible. In that same vein, Scott Wright's site has us taking Campbell at #3, and the Jets taking Long a few picks later. When it's all said and done, surely we've got a crack at one of them.
Unless we win 11 in row, like I'm expecting.:)