Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
-02-24-2011 #1
Could it get any better than this?
This is the time of year where I look around everywhere to find every mock and opinion I can, but usually there's one or two picks I really don't like. I stumbled upon this one, though, yesterday, which I think would honestly give us the best first three rounds of the draft. Here it is
Bradford would get two new great weapons and we'd have someone to groom behind James Hall. Do you guys think we can do any better than this?
Originally Posted by MockDraftClub
Last edited by Nick; -02-24-2011 at 06:42 PM. Reason: Removing link
-
-02-24-2011 #2
Re: Could it get any better than this?
McDaniels does not use TE's enough to justify drafting one with our second round pick. DeSpags have been great at picking second round starters and I feel this would be a waste of a pick. Other than that I like the way the first and third round looked.
-
-02-24-2011 #3
Re: Could it get any better than this?
-
-02-24-2011 #4
Re: Could it get any better than this?
I agree about the TE. If the draft was going like that, I would opt for S DeAndre McDaniel who went 2 spots later.
-
-02-24-2011 #5
Re: Could it get any better than this?
No thanks on the TE. I am not too sure why people are so quick to bash Hoomanwanui.
-
-02-24-2011 #6
Re: Could it get any better than this?
Yeah especially with O.J. being a FA. Rudolph is a borderline first round pick tho so I couldn't complain with that
-
-02-24-2011 #7
Re: Could it get any better than this?
I really like what I've seen from Hoomanawanui, too, but Bradford made Jermaine Gresham a first round pick at Oklahoma so I'd love to see what he could do with Rudolph
-
-02-24-2011 #8
Re: Could it get any better than this?
Even if Rudolph falls into the 2nd round, I'd still consider that a luxury pick based on the weapons we have. Now I'm not overexaggerating on how great Hoomanawanui, Fells, Bajema, or Onobun is but I'd prefer giving these guys another chance to see what they got under the McDaniels system. If we were to draft a TE in the 2nd round whilst knowing we still have issues in other areas such as OLB, SS, and depths at DE and DT, we might as well draft Mark Ingram in the 1st round knowing that we're getting a luxury pick out of a high round.
-
-02-24-2011 #9
Re: Could it get any better than this?
welcome to the Clan BoJangles.
i tend to agree with the folks who are against us drafting Rudulph but i`ll leave it at that as i don`t want to end up discouraging new members from posting.
-
-02-24-2011 #10
Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Arkansas
- Age
- 57
- Posts
- 2,023
- Rep Power
- 39
Re: Could it get any better than this?
Yeah, but Quinn was more of a blocking TE than anything. He never did much in the way of route running and receiving to justify where he was selected.
Shees...sure glad McDaniels is not in charge of personnel like he was in Denver. One of the all-time train wrecks considering what he started with.
WHAT SAY YE?
-
-02-24-2011 #11
Re: Could it get any better than this?
Haha yeah thank god he's not making personnel decisions, he was one of the worst in recent memory. I think I ascribe more to the BPA approach b/c it seems to work for teams like Baltimore and New England so that's why I had no problem with Rudolph. I can see why you'd be against it though.
-
-02-24-2011 #12
Re: Could it get any better than this?
In an interview (on stlouisrams.com I think), Billy said how he is really going to stick to the board this year, he talked about how in the past in later rounds he reached on need, and it still bothers him because they didn't pan out. So if this Rudolph kid is several grades higher than anyone else on the board, I could see us drafting him.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks