Dane Looker...

***RamJackson39*** · -02-21-2006

Is there anyone else who would like to see Dane Looker have an expanded role in the offense? He has some of the best hands on the team and is always there in a Ricky Proehl type form. I'd love to see him get more playing time. He's a more consistent player than Shaun McDonald and a guy that I love for his heart and dedication to the game.

***MFranke*** · -02-21-2006

He's a better punt returner than Shaun, too.
--Mike

***RealRam*** · -02-21-2006

Yes, I would! Looker is not fast but seems to run well disciplined routs -- and as you said, 39, has very good hands (reliable holder for Wilkins too).

I kind of favor him over McDonald as WR for the same reasons as well: heart and dedication -- McDonald would perhaps be able to contribute more in kick returns.

T. Holt, I. Bruce, K. Curtis, D. Looker / M. Faulk, S. McDonald. :football:

***UtterBlitz*** · -02-21-2006

I like Dane Looker and I would not mind seeing him get a bigger role in the offense as long as he really has his hands and brain working together again. He really did seem to pull it back together this last season which was good to see.

He does not have the speed of some of the other receivers, but has a lot of experience, and he can adjust to overcome whatever the defense is doing on the field. He is a smart player.

***psycho9985*** · -02-21-2006

He was a very good stand in for the 2003 season.I say we keep him.

***RamsFan16*** · -02-21-2006

I like Dane Looker too. he was a solid WR and a good PR. I would love to have him back.

***UtterBlitz*** · -02-22-2006

Originally Posted by RamsFan16

I like Dane Looker too. he was a solid WR and a good PR. I would love to have him back.

Is Dane gone? Do you have some inside information 16?

***RamsFan16*** · -02-22-2006

Oh I kept thinking he was a Free Agent. Owell cut out the "I would love to have him back" and the rest goes with my response

***UtterBlitz*** · -02-22-2006

It's all good 16.

***sbramfan*** · -02-22-2006

MacDonald needs to go. Can we trade him for a defensive player? He has a pretty good resume/highlight real for us to shop him around with?

***Hodgins*** · -02-22-2006

no, not really, the 4 recievers ahead of him are legitimatly better, I dont think there can be any arguement that hes not the best no5 in the league though:tongue: