Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,988
    Rep Power
    74

    Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2005

    Same Old, Same Old?
    While the Vikings' victory over the Packers on Sunday gained them new followers and even won the conviction of some NFL playoff prognosticators that the Vikings are destined for Super Bowl glory this season, there is reason to believe that much of this week's celebration is a bit premature. At the top of the list for doubters--a.k.a., those still awash in recollections of the Vikings' 3-7 finish crowned with an apathy-laden finish against a team long out of the playoffs--are the persistent offensive issues and the inescapable conclusion that, if the Vikings need to rely on their defense to win at Philly defeat is almost certainly in the cards.

    Starting Quick...

    The Vikings began the first quarter of the Packer game in aberrational style by putting points on the board early and often. Throughout the regular season, the Vikings were one of the lowest scoring first quarter teams in the NFL, often enduring stretches of games without a first-quarter TD. Against the Packers, that ignominy ceased, as the Vikings scored TDs on their first two drives of the game. Following a third-drive field goal, the Vikings forged an early 17-0 lead.

    Then came the rest of the game.

    Second Quarter Wisdom

    Vikings' fans have grown accustomed to a certain offensive trend. The Vikings tend to put a field goal or less on the board in the first quarter, move the ball well in the second quarter, a quarter in which they tend to amass most of their points for the game, and finish with a fizzle in the second half. On Sunday, the Vikings began the fizzle a bit earlier. Despite converting a TD on a second-quarter drive, that conversion was largely the consequence of having to move the ball a mere 28 yards, following a pick of a Brett Favre pass. On the only other drive in the second quarter, the Vikings drove the ball well only to have Morton Andersen's chip-shot field goal attempt blocked.

    It may appear nit-picky to chastise a team for failing to convert a TD on 100% of its second quarter drives. But the criticism, which I am about to level, is founded not on mere statistics, but also on the more damning history of the Vikings' 2004 offensive play-calling in goal-to-go situations. Thus, although it is difficult to fathom how a 27-yard field-goal attempt can get blocked, more disconcerting (given my near-absolute disinterest in attempting to explain why the Vikings continue to rely on a kicker that is less than automatic even from short range--forcing the team to activate two kickers and to deactivate a quality running back or defensive lineman--rather than relying on Jose Cortez for kickoffs and field goal attempts) is the fact that the Vikings were even attempting a 27-yard field goal. How did this happen?

    It happened because the Vikings once again reverted to form. Which means that offensive coordinator Scott Linehan relied on the same ploys that have gotten the Vikings where they are today--a wild card team with no hope of a home playoff game.

    On first and goal from the Packers' nine-yard line, the Vikings ran SOD up the gut for a generous yard. Sound familiar? It should. The Vikings run the same play on first and goal virtually every week. I would argue that such a play makes sense, if it ever worked for the Vikings. Unfortunately, it never does. But that doesn't stop Linehan and Co. from banging their heads against the same brick wall. Nor does it stop the Vikings from scoring on 1st and goal yet again.

    On second and goal, the Vikings ran a pass play to the left. That's fine if it works, of course, but it is also highly predictable from this offense. Presumably, the thinking is that Daunte receives (marginally) better pass protection from the left side of the line and the inexperienced right side is less likely to jump the count and false start on a play to the left--a la Adam Haayer or Adam Goldberg--so the Vikings like to try the left-side pass in 2nd and goal situations. Again, that's fine. If it works.

    But it usually does not work for the Vikings. Not because the opponent sacks Daunte, but because the Vikings sack themselves before the play is even run. The Vikings commit this self-infliction by telegraphing their plays. It is, after all, the play that the Vikings virtually always run on 2nd and goal following a SOD up-the-gut-for-a-yard play on 1st and goal. If the Vikings insist on running this play on 2nd and goal, how about running a no-huddle offense with a quick snap. That might just work. Alas, it is not part of the script.

    And when the Vikings failed on the pass left on 2nd and goal, they decided to really pull out all of the stops. How? Simple. They ran the same play that they nearly always run after the failed 2nd and goal pass to the left. They ran a pass to the right. Sneaky.

    Yes, the pass was completed. But the receiver, Moe Williams, really had no chance to score. In part, he had no chance to score because the pass called was well outside the five-yard line, allowing the defenders ample opportunity to adjust given the short field. But, in greater part, the play failed because, like the two plays before it, the Vikings ran a play on 3rd and goal that they typically run on third and goal--a pass right. The only more predictable play would have been a corner-of-the-endzone lob to Moss or Burleson. And teams are increasingly hip to the routine.

    Maybe Tice and Linehan simply thought that, on the road, in the playoffs, with a comfortable lead, there was no reason to risk a turnover. A field goal was still pretty good, they likely agreed.

    But there was an alternative, an alternative that is nearly as good as gold. And that alternative was to put the ball in Daunte's hands three straight plays and to challenge the Packers to stop Daunte. No, not three straight passing plays, three straight running plays. Three straight QB keepers.

    On the play that set up the 1st and goal at the Packers' nine-yard line, facing 3rd and five, Daunte romped 27 yards to the right. Given this display, was there any reason not to have Daunte keep the ball on three straight plays? Not really. Except that Linehan's script--one etched in stone for the season--calls for two things. The first is to follow the script. The second is that, despite having a gargantuan QB that is virtually unstoppable on the ground, particularly if given three attempts to gain a paltry 9 yards, Daunte must not run unless running for his life.

    Which raises the burning question. For what are the Vikings saving Daunte from the small possibility of injury? Even granting that it is in the long-term interests of the team and the QB to limit the QB's running, is there any justification for eliminating running plays from Daunte's repertoire when the environment clearly calls for such a play? Only if the offensive coordinator and head coach refuse to deviate from what is etched in stone.

    As a result of the Vikings' commitment to script, rather than leading the Packers 31-10 at the half, they settled for a 24-10 halftime lead. Yes, the Vikings held the lead. But will continued predictable playcalling pass muster against the more defensively formidable Eagles. Likely not.

    Second Half Baubles

    Even more disconcerting than the dismal 1st and goal failure in the second quarter was the Vikings' continuing second-half dry spell. Once again, the Vikings were unable to generate much offense in the second half of a game. And the blame appears to fall squarely on the coaching staff and Daunte Culpepper for failing to instill a second-half game plan and failing to stick to a game plan or to take what the defense was giving.

    The Vikings had three third quarter possessions and ran a total of 13 plays. One of the three drives included a charming three and out that started at the Green Bay 23 and concluded with a punt from the Green Bay 30. Apparently there is no kicker on the Vikings' team capable of converting a 47-yard field goal. And, even more apparent, is that there is no offensive force on the Vikings capable of calling a drive in the clutch.

    On three straight plays, the Vikings ran pass plays. All three plays failed.

    The two subsequent third-quarter drives met similar fates. And only a 6-play, 66-yard, fourth-quarter TD strike and a clock-grinding drive to end the game--a drive the likes of which the Vikings could have and should have employed in the third quarter--salvaged the Vikings from offensive embarrassment in the second half.

    Given these failures, failures that repeat from game to game, it is a wonderment that some prognosticators actually favor the Vikings to beat the Eagles. Can the Vikings win? Yes. The Vikings can win the same way any playoff team can beat any other playoff team. But, given the continuing trends--the predilection to predictable playcalling, the inability to control the offensive tempo at critical junctures in the game, and the helter-skelter approach that appears to seize Linehan's and Culpepper's approach to the game at critical moments--there is reason for concern.

    But that concern is not relegated to the Vikings' offensive predictability, it also permeates onto the defensive side of the ball. Despite what the statistics show from last Sunday's game--four INTs and a number one defensive-unit rating among playoff teams--contrary to what the NFL's statistics "show," the Vikings enter Sunday's round of games with the usual suspect defense. And that is the subject of tomorrow's column.




    http://vikesgeek.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_archive.html


  2. #2
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    That's very interesting. I guess it's history repeating itself in 2007.

    One point in the article made mention of the fact that Linehan's play calling was putting Moe Williams in a position that even if he EXECUTED the play correctly there would be now way he could score.

    I think that Linehan puts the Rams in position to hang on, forcing the players to EXECUTE a way to get points in the second half.

  3. #3
    moloch41's Avatar
    moloch41 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    1,617
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    This sounds about right. If you looked at the offense between the first and second half- Bruce and Holt were schooling the Falcon DBs, but in the second half- the DBs were jumping the routes- like they knew what was coming. I think this staff is able to put together an initial gameplan, but once teams adjust, they can do very little to counter it. Both our offense and defense has been getting slapped around in the second half of games this year. Yesterday, we go to see Chris Redman look like the reincarnation of Joe Montana.

  4. #4
    RamsInfiniti's Avatar
    RamsInfiniti is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    R.I.P.
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,743
    Rep Power
    77

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    Wow, the questioning of Linehan's offensive prowess never stops does it:

    Minn 2002 - 387.0 YPG #2 NFL, 24.4 PPG #8 NFL
    Minn 2003 - 393.4 YPG #1 NFL, 26.0 PPG #5 NFL
    Minn 2004 - 396.2 YPG #4 NFL, 25.3 PPG #5 NFL
    Mia 2005 - 324.00 YPG #14 NFL, 19.9 PPG #16 NFL

    Minn 2001 - 295.0 YPG
    Mia 2004 - 275.3 YPG #29 NFL, 17.2 PPG #28 NFL

    So, explain that. Linehan, assuming he is so incompetent, how did he generate such improvement?

    Any success Culpepper had was a direct result of being in Linehan's regime, look at his numbers ...

    The downfall of those Viking teams was terrible defense ...

    No coach always gets the playcalls correct ...

  5. #5
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    Wow, ok. I wonder what Opie (Linehan) sold to be able to abstain himself from ever being critized by some of our fans.

  6. #6
    RamsInfiniti's Avatar
    RamsInfiniti is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    R.I.P.
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,743
    Rep Power
    77

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    Linehan can be, and deserves to be, criticized for certain things. But to deem him incompetent based on what he is doing he is just invalid in so many ways. He has a history of being a successful offensive coordinator, regardless of what he's done here. Maybe he is just not a good fit, who knows ...

  7. #7
    txramsfan's Avatar
    txramsfan is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Age
    50
    Posts
    7,266
    Rep Power
    65

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    No one said anything about being incompetent. It's about his teams not playing at the same level of intensity in the second half as they do in the first. I understand that you are a big Linehan fan, I can appreciate that as I was a big Martz fan. However, I could see his flaws. He didn't protect the QB, he would give up on the run way too early, and he would be stubborn and try plays that weren't working on that particular day.

    When fans point out Linehan's flaws, members in the pro-Linehan camp jump up and down screaming execution or injuries had to do with what happened, never play calling or making adjustments. Well let me tell you, unless the Rams start putting fannies back into the seats at the dome you in the pro-Linehan camp can scream execution and injuries were the problem all you want to, Linehan will be gone.

    It's all about W's and L's and stadium receipts. Not about fairness.

  8. #8
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,988
    Rep Power
    74

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    Minn 2002 - 387.0 YPG #2 NFL, 24.4 PPG #8 NFL
    Minn 2003 - 393.4 YPG #1 NFL, 26.0 PPG #5 NFL
    Minn 2004 - 396.2 YPG #4 NFL, 25.3 PPG #5 NFL
    Mia 2005 - 324.00 YPG #14 NFL, 19.9 PPG #16 NFL

    Minn 2001 - 295.0 YPG
    Mia 2004 - 275.3 YPG #29 NFL, 17.2 PPG #28 NFL

    So, explain that. Linehan, assuming he is so incompetent, how did he generate such improvement?

    Any success Culpepper had was a direct result of being in Linehan's regime, look at his numbers ...

    The downfall of those Viking teams was terrible defense ...

    No coach always gets the playcalls correct
    This is what truly scares me about Linehan. Moss is so good going deep; we still see it today with Moss and Brady. I’m not sure Linehan’s offense is as good as these numbers. WE all remember what that was like, we all seen enough highlights of Moss making great down field catches of two DB’s. When I think of Walsh and the west cost offense, I can see a system, same with Martz. What does Linehan’s offense look like? I’m still not sure…

    Any success Culpepper had was a direct result of being in Linehan's regime, look at his numbers ...
    Was MOSS not Linehan...
    Last edited by Rambos; -12-03-2007 at 01:13 PM.

  9. #9
    Varg6's Avatar
    Varg6 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    3,613
    Rep Power
    43

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    Agreed TX. And reading that article, it looks like this all makes sense. Almost like a deja vu all over again offensively. It is sad to see that by this time as a 2nd year head coach, he hasn't figured out one of the most important and crucial parts of being a head coach: Necessary Adjustments. The Rams' halftime adjustments are virtually non-existant and obviously seeing that we're 3-9...That is one of the primary reasons for that record. Obviously if we're able to have a 21-0 lead in the 1st half, we have the talent and the necessary playcalling to keep that up two extra quarters. So, again, people that are pro-Linehan please give me an excuse as to why we cannot maintain a substantial lead like that for another two quarters? Because I KNOW it is not execution or injuries. A better example would obviously be the Seattle game which I am still incredibly angry about...


    Always and Forever a fan of the St. Louis Rams

  10. #10
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,988
    Rep Power
    74

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    I see Linehan falling for “fool’s gold”. We come out using our skill guys in the first half, passing first running second. If we look at Sundays game, Holt and Bruce where abusing that rookie DB. We get a nice lead and here is where Linehan falls for the fool’s gold. He tries to work on the clock, as the score starts to get tighter he thinks he can run the ball. Not with this patchwork O line.

    LB Keith Brooking


    (On the Rams first possessions and scores)
    “From what I remembered it was big plays when they scored. They weren’t pounding us, just big plays in the passing game. We weren’t getting a rush on the quarterback. We weren’t getting enough depth on our linebackers and we kind of had some break down in coverage.”


    (On the Rams choice to throw the ball)
    “They tried to run the ball, but they couldn’t. Obviously, they had to go to something else and the passing game was working. They kept trying to run the ball on every series and we were doing a pretty good job of stuffing it and they were making plays in the passing game in the first half. So, obviously they were going to stick with what they were having success with.”

    IMO the only thing that should have changed in the second half with that lead just keep hitting them with quick passes, work on the rookie DB until he’s toasted.

  11. #11
    ramsbruce's Avatar
    ramsbruce is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Here
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,409
    Rep Power
    50

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    Whether the stats and info are correct or not (who really knows) this came from a vikesgeek blog. Anyone can start a blog. Just sayin.
    BRUUUUUUUUCE


  12. #12
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    8,988
    Rep Power
    74

    Re: Does Linehan have a long History of poor second halves?

    Whether the stats and info are correct or not (who really knows) this came from a vikesgeek blog. Anyone can start a blog. Just sayin.
    So true...

Similar Threads

  1. Postgame With Gordo
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: -11-19-2007, 03:04 PM
  2. Thomas Live
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: -09-19-2007, 01:06 PM
  3. Mentor to Linehan will serve as a scout
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: -08-14-2007, 01:14 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -12-04-2006, 04:09 PM
  5. Shaw did his homework on Linehan
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: -01-20-2006, 10:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •