# Thread: Great news for Rams- Giants beat skins 24-17

1. ## Re: Great news for Rams- Giants beat skins 24-17

If Matthews is on the board when the Falcons are picking, I think they go with him in a second. ATL needs OL and DL help badly, and a lot of money is tied-up on the O. Better bring in a stud like Matthews because they sure do need him.

2. ## Re: Great news for Rams- Giants beat skins 24-17

How ironic would it be for our last pick of the RG3 trade to end up being the 2nd pick? We will have truly come full circle.

3. Registered User
Join Date
Apr 2013
Location
las vegas
Posts
213
Rep Power
2

## Re: Great news for Rams- Giants beat skins 24-17

Originally Posted by general counsel
Mods, move this post wherever you want, but GREAT news for the Rams tonight, the fighting Eli's just beat the Redskins. That is a HUGE loss for the skins, playing at home, in what was a very winnable game for them. Onward and upward to the top of the draft for the Rams with the Redskins #1 pick!

Ramming speed to all

general counsel

Good post - time to get focused on next years draft - we have a chance to finish building to team to compete. Just need a new OC and fill in the rest.

Who do you like in next years draft ?

4. ## Re: Great news for Rams- Giants beat skins 24-17

According to Nick Wagoner, if the draft were tomorrow, the Rams would pick 2nd!
I just read that they are officially in the #3 and #15 positions, as of today. With six teams currently at 5-7 and three others at 4-8, we could seriously be looking at 2 top 10 picks when it all plays out.

5. ## Re: Great news for Rams- Giants beat skins 24-17

After Hags - Aints MNF. Since leaving out the MNF contestants made such a dramatic change from Sunday to Monday, I will only post updates after MNF.

Rank \ Team \ Record \ SOS
1 \ BUCCANEERS \ 3-9-0 \ 0.590
2 \ FALCONS \ 3-9-0 \ 0.556
3 \ TEXANS \ 2-10-0 \ 0.556
4 \ BILLS \ 4-8-0 \ 0.542
5 \ GIANTS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.542
6 \ JAGUARS \ 3-9-0 \ 0.542
7 \ RAMS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.535
8 \ CARDINALS \ 7-5-0 \ 0.521
9 \ REDSKINS \ 3-9-0 \ 0.521
10 \ BRONCOS \ 10-2-0 \ 0.521
11 \ VIKINGS \ 3-8-1 \ 0.514
12 \ DOLPHINS \ 6-6-0 \ 0.507
15 \ TITANS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.507
13 \ COWBOYS \ 7-5-0 \ 0.503
14 \ ***** \ 8-4-0 \ 0.503
17 \ SAINTS \ 9-3-0 \ 0.500
16 \ CHARGERS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.500
19 \ BROWNS \ 4-8-0 \ 0.493
20 \ COLTS \ 8-4-0 \ 0.493
18 \ JETS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.493
21 \ PATRIOTS \ 9-3-0 \ 0.479
22 \ RAIDERS \ 4-8-0 \ 0.479
24 \ PACKERS \ 5-6-1 \ 0.472
23 \ BEARS \ 6-6-0 \ 0.469
26 \ PANTHERS \ 9-3-0 \ 0.469
25 \ STEELERS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.469
27 \ EAGLES \ 7-5-0 \ 0.462
28 \ BENGALS \ 8-4-0 \ 0.462
30 \ CHIEFS \ 9-3-0 \ 0.458
29 \ SEAHAWKS \ 11-1-0 \ 0.455
31 \ RAVENS \ 6-6-0 \ 0.448
32 \ LIONS \ 7-5-0 \ 0.441
Originally Posted by gap
Since Strength of Schedule was mentioned, and it could impact draft order, here is the current SoS for each team. Since this is plain text, " \ " is used as a separator. I will try to keep this updated as the season goes on.

Team \ Record \ SOS
BUCCANEERS \ 3-9-0 \ 0.595
FALCONS \ 3-9-0 \ 0.566
TEXANS \ 2-10-0 \ 0.555
BILLS \ 4-8-0 \ 0.547
GIANTS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.542
JAGUARS \ 3-9-0 \ 0.541
RAMS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.534
CARDINALS \ 7-5-0 \ 0.526
REDSKINS \ 3-9-0 \ 0.521
BRONCOS \ 10-2-0 \ 0.521
VIKINGS \ 3-8-1 \ 0.513
DOLPHINS \ 6-6-0 \ 0.513
COWBOYS \ 7-5-0 \ 0.509
***** \ 8-4-0 \ 0.509
TITANS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.506
CHARGERS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.500
JETS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.499
BROWNS \ 4-8-0 \ 0.493
COLTS \ 8-4-0 \ 0.492
PATRIOTS \ 9-3-0 \ 0.485
RAIDERS \ 4-8-0 \ 0.479
BEARS \ 6-6-0 \ 0.474
PACKERS \ 5-6-1 \ 0.472
STEELERS \ 5-7-0 \ 0.469
PANTHERS \ 9-3-0 \ 0.468
SAINTS \ 9-2-0 \ 0.462
EAGLES \ 7-5-0 \ 0.462
BENGALS \ 8-4-0 \ 0.462
CHIEFS \ 9-3-0 \ 0.458
RAVENS \ 6-6-0 \ 0.448
LIONS \ 7-5-0 \ 0.441
SEAHAWKS \ 10-1-0 \ 0.428

gap
.
Last edited by gap; -12-03-2013 at 12:44 PM.

6. ## Re: Great news for Rams- Giants beat skins 24-17

Originally Posted by Fargo Ram Fan
I just read that they are officially in the #3 and #15 positions, as of today. With six teams currently at 5-7 and three others at 4-8, we could seriously be looking at 2 top 10 picks when it all plays out.
My formula may be wrong, but I show 2 and 14

Pos \ Team \ Wins \ Loses \ Ties \ SOS
1 \ TEXANS \ 2 \ 10 \ 0 \ 0.556
2 \ REDSKINS \ 3 \ 9 \ 0 \ 0.521
3 \ JAGUARS \ 3 \ 9 \ 0 \ 0.542
4 \ FALCONS \ 3 \ 9 \ 0 \ 0.556
5 \ BUCCANEERS \ 3 \ 9 \ 0 \ 0.590
6 \ VIKINGS \ 3 \ 8 \ 1 \ 0.514
7 \ RAIDERS \ 4 \ 8 \ 0 \ 0.479
8 \ BROWNS \ 4 \ 8 \ 0 \ 0.493
9 \ BILLS \ 4 \ 8 \ 0 \ 0.542
10 \ STEELERS \ 5 \ 7 \ 0 \ 0.469
11 \ JETS \ 5 \ 7 \ 0 \ 0.493
12 \ CHARGERS \ 5 \ 7 \ 0 \ 0.500
13 \ TITANS \ 5 \ 7 \ 0 \ 0.507
14 \ RAMS \ 5 \ 7 \ 0 \ 0.535
15 \ GIANTS \ 5 \ 7 \ 0 \ 0.542
16 \ PACKERS \ 5 \ 6 \ 1 \ 0.472
17 \ RAVENS \ 6 \ 6 \ 0 \ 0.448
18 \ BEARS \ 6 \ 6 \ 0 \ 0.469
19 \ DOLPHINS \ 6 \ 6 \ 0 \ 0.507
20 \ LIONS \ 7 \ 5 \ 0 \ 0.441
21 \ EAGLES \ 7 \ 5 \ 0 \ 0.462
22 \ COWBOYS \ 7 \ 5 \ 0 \ 0.503
23 \ CARDINALS \ 7 \ 5 \ 0 \ 0.521
24 \ BENGALS \ 8 \ 4 \ 0 \ 0.462
25 \ COLTS \ 8 \ 4 \ 0 \ 0.493
26 \ ***** \ 8 \ 4 \ 0 \ 0.503
27 \ CHIEFS \ 9 \ 3 \ 0 \ 0.458
28 \ PANTHERS \ 9 \ 3 \ 0 \ 0.469
29 \ PATRIOTS \ 9 \ 3 \ 0 \ 0.479
30 \ SAINTS \ 9 \ 3 \ 0 \ 0.500
31 \ BRONCOS \ 10 \ 2 \ 0 \ 0.521
32 \ SEAHAWKS \ 11 \ 1 \ 0 \ 0.455

gap
.
Last edited by gap; -12-03-2013 at 12:44 PM.

Page 2 of 2 First 12

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•