| ClanRam |
|
|
| 9/7 |
Eagles |
L |
3 - 38 |
| 9/14 |
Giants |
L |
13-41 |
| 9/21 |
Seahawks |
L |
13-37 |
| 9/28 |
Bills |
L |
14-31 |
| 10/5 |
BYE |
|
| 10/12 |
Redskins |
W |
19-17 |
| 10/19 |
Cowboys |
W |
34-14 |
| 10/26 |
Patriots |
L |
16-23 |
| 11/10 |
Cardinals |
L |
13-34 |
| 11/10 |
Jets |
L |
3-47 |
| 11/16 |
Whiners |
L |
16-35 |
| 11/23 |
Bears |
- |
Noon |
| 11/30 |
Dolphins |
- |
Noon |
| 12/7 |
Cardinals |
- |
3:15pm |
| 12/14 |
Seahawks |
- |
Noon |
| 12/21 |
Whiners |
- |
Noon |
| 12/28 |
Falcons |
- |
Noon |
|
|
|
|
|
| Notices |
This site is for All Rams fans, the world over.
Please register now, for free, and benefit for new features that only come with being a registered member of the ClanRam |
 |
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cali
Age: 44
Posts: 3,228
Rep Power: 17
|
|
|
Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
I noticed he was getting carries behind SJ. What does this mean, is he number two behind SJ?
__________________
Chris Long DE Height: 6-4 Weight: 284
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Belfast,Northern Ireland
Age: 24
Posts: 591
Rep Power: 3
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
This guy could be a steal for us, had a great run yesterday. But to answer the question I think it's just Linehan wanting Leonard to get settled at being the lead blocker for SJ thus limiting his own carries. When SJ went down Leonard stepped in for him and if the same thing was to happen again then Leonard would get the majority of the run's..
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
Pittman was a helluva steal.
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Veteran Ram
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: cumbria, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 554
Rep Power: 12
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
Not sure, but to me, it looked that way. He was certainly useful carrying the ball.
__________________
I WANT COOKIE! THAT ONE!
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tupelo, MS
Age: 26
Posts: 736
Rep Power: 5
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
I think that would be impossible. Leonard was never brought in to be the featured back and certainly Pittman would have a better chance of filling that role.
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 44
Posts: 5,847
Rep Power: 24
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
Leonard has too much upside and can do much more things than just be a RB. In a more likely scenario, Pittman replaces Minor.
__________________
Why do people say "I don't mean to interrupt BUT". If you don't mean to interrupt, don't interrupt.
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Ram MVP
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maui, Hi.
Age: 64
Posts: 1,450
Rep Power: 17
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rambos
I noticed he was getting carries behind SJ. What does this mean, is he number two behind SJ?
|
My take is that the Rams envision different roles for Brian and Antonio. With the emergence of Pittman as a true running back, Brian will be able to focus on being a lead blocker, blitz-pickup specialist, and receiver out of the backfield in addition to getting a tote now and then as a FB. Pittman likely has moved ahead of Travis Minor and will back up Jackson as Minor is more a third down back than an every down running back. In summary, it looks as if our overall rb talent got cranked up another notch
__________________
Chris Long being interviewed by Dan Patrick:
Dan: "So Chris, I hear you got injured in camp yesterday"
Chris: "Uh that's not a word in my vocabulary Dan"
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jersey
Age: 44
Posts: 1,260
Rep Power: 7
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
.
Pittman can't block.
He doesn't have a Touchdown. He doesn't have a 100 yard game.
Let's wait to anoint him.
Take away his longest run and he was 6 carries for 10 yards.
He was averaging two yards per carry before that game.
Last edited by Tony Soprano; -12-11-2007 at 10:20 PM.
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,485
Rep Power: 14
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
He certainly would be a nice change up to Jackson in terms of speed. Like Tony said, let's wait to annoint him, but he had some nice bursts in his first action. Hopefully he'll get more carries in coming weeks to see what he can do. Leonard might make a better H Back.
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Ram MVP
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maui, Hi.
Age: 64
Posts: 1,450
Rep Power: 17
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Soprano
.
Pittman can't block.
He doesn't have a Touchdown. He doesn't have a 100 yard game.
Let's wait to anoint him.
Take away his longest run and he was 6 carries for 10 yards.
He was averaging two yards per carry before that game.
|
Anoint him as what? you're right that he is basically an unproven rookie, however he excelled at the major college level, and was the fourth or fifth rated running back in the 2007 draft. Travis Minor will be 29 next June, and Pittman will turn 22 this December. He's a little bigger, faster, and alot younger, plus we got him on the cheap. Therefore it isn't too great a stretch to project him as an improvement over Minor.
__________________
Chris Long being interviewed by Dan Patrick:
Dan: "So Chris, I hear you got injured in camp yesterday"
Chris: "Uh that's not a word in my vocabulary Dan"
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, Ca.
Age: 49
Posts: 4,699
Rep Power: 33
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
Hard to tell what's going on with the backs, but Pittman got 7 carries to Leonard's 2. It will be interesting to see if the trend continues against the whiners.
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,499
Rep Power: 10
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by txramsfan
Leonard has too much upside and can do much more things than just be a RB. In a more likely scenario, Pittman replaces Minor.
|
Hit the nail on the head. I don't think he's replacing Brian Leonard...not yet at least. He still has a lot of proving to do. As blocking goes, from what I've seen, Leonard has surpassed Klopfenstein...
__________________
Always and Forever a fan of the St. Louis Rams
|

-12-11-2007
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 51
Posts: 5,497
Rep Power: 31
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by txramsfan
Leonard has too much upside and can do much more things than just be a RB. In a more likely scenario, Pittman replaces Minor.
|
We have a B-I-N-G-O !!!!
__________________
 GO RAMS
|

-13-11-2007
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Cali
Age: 44
Posts: 3,228
Rep Power: 17
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
Klopfenstein made some nice blocks Sunday, I was shocked.
__________________
Chris Long DE Height: 6-4 Weight: 284
|

-13-11-2007
|
 |
Pro Bowl Ram
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 4,591
Rep Power: 25
|
|
|
Re: Has Pittman moved ahead of BL?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXramsfan
Leonard has too much upside and can do much more things than just be a RB. In a more likely scenario, Pittman replaces Minor.
|
Exactly. Pittman has a higher, stronger potential than Minor and as TX said, he'll probably end up replacing him. But Leonard is well planned into the Rams offense -- he just needs some more time and a healthier OL to get the job done, either as a blocker or as a runner.
I was elated to see Pittman join the Rams (I agree, he's a steal). I hope he sees himself as being part of a powerful Rams running game trio: Jax and Leonard / Pittman.
__________________
RealRam
If you have integrity, nothing else matters.
If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters. -- Unknown _______________________________________________________
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:11 PM.
|