View Poll Results: If Martz could have gotten along with the FO. Whos regime would you rather have?
- Voters
- 51. You may not vote on this poll
-
Linehans regime
31 60.78% -
Martz regime
20 39.22%
Results 91 to 105 of 135
Thread: Linehan vs Martz Regime
-
-06-13-2006 #91STLRAMSFAN Guest
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
Where have you really heard me bash Martz in this thread? I have not been bashing Martz I am thankful for his years here as the head coach. If it were up to me though and I had to make the decision between Martz and his choice for coaches or Linehan and his choice for coaches to lead our Rams it would be Linehan for me. I realize Martz may have changed his staff but our special teams have been in sad shape and the defense with Marmie for two years running has been horrible. It does not make me feel good that Martz can turn those two areas around. I am thankful for what he did but I lost a lot of faith in Martz as a head coach.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
I think someone needs anger management. Come on its easy to make the call after the fact. We had several threads that were aimed at grading the moves of Linehan and his staff. Were those all speculation also. Because no one attacked those threads. Is it speculation that the FO would rather have Linehan then Martz. NO.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
Its not speculation that I know I would rather have Linehan then Martz coaching this team. That was the question that was asked of every one. This is a similar question the FO had to ask them selves in getting rid of Martz. They asked themselves if they thought they would be better off going in another direction. Was it speculation that they thought they would be better off? Yes. Was it speculation that they thought they did not want Martz. No.
This thread was not based on speculation. It was not based on who is better. It was based on people’s preference about which they would rather have even if Martz did not have FO problems. It was about making a decision on which they would rather start this season with. It was NOT about whom do you think the better coach IS or WILL BE.Last edited by STLRAMSFAN; -06-13-2006 at 07:22 PM.
-
-06-13-2006 #92
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
Fact is...the FO is a lot smarter than we all thought, and they couldn't wait for Martz to pack up and leave, now they're happy with this guy, and did some good things..

Always and Forever a fan of the St. Louis Rams
-
-06-14-2006 #93
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
Yes, they were. Why? Because we have no idea how Linehan's team will perform. So yes, by definition, that is speculation.Come on its easy to make the call after the fact. We had several threads that were aimed at grading the moves of Linehan and his staff. Were those all speculation also.It's a fact that you want Linehan over Martz, but you're reasons for that are pure speculation. Why? Because you have absolutely no conclusive evidence to choose Linehan over Martz.Its not speculation that I know I would rather have Linehan then Martz coaching this teamThis thread is entirely speculation. Your original post laid out several points, none of which pointed to anything conclusive in favor of Linehan over Martz. It was all he-said, she-said and your personal feelings. That my friend is speculation.This thread was not based on speculation.
There's nothing wrong with speculation, but don't wrap it up as if you've presented factual evidence to reach some conclusion about which coach we should be more "comfortable" with. It's just random opinions. Sure, we can all feel good about Linehan if we choose to. I do. But to even mention Linehan and Martz in the same sentence in some form of comparison has no basis whatsoever.As I said before, if Martz and Zygmunt were getting along, this wouldn't even be a question. There would be no Linehan.It was based on people’s preference about which they would rather have even if Martz did not have FO problemsAre you kidding? Ok, here we go.Where have you really heard me bash Martz in this thread?
Originally Posted by STL
Of course, fell free to ignore the fact that Martz built the team you say he inherited. Never mind that he had to re-build that shoddy defense he was handed. Look over the fact that Zygmunt blocked the re-signing of Conwell and Wistrom. Forget about, the often lauded Lovie Smith who wanted Duncan over Fletcher. And by all means, it is certainly Martz' fault for not holding back the hands of time. I mean who does he think he is letting guys like Faulk get older?
Originally Posted by STL
But I digress, let's go ahead with you "not bashing Martz".
Originally Posted by STL
Originally Posted by STL
Originally Posted by STL
Yep, had nothing to do with an aging O-line or Jackson's inability to block anybody last year. It was all Martz "allowing" it.
Originally Posted by STL
Originally Posted by STL
LOL, yea it sounds like you're thankful.
Originally Posted by STL
Look, STL, it's like this; you're a one-trick pony. You hate Martz, and you want everyone else to hate Martz. Don't be ashamed of it. Embrace it. Look at Rebel13. He embraces the fact that all he posts about is how bad he hates Martz. It's okay, dude, don't be ashamed of it. People may not agree with it, but it's your god given right to hate whoever you want, Martz or otherwise.
But for those of us who have moved on, we find these "I hate Martz" sort of threads a little, shall I say, obsessive. You can re-write the question any way you want, but it boils down to you hating Martz. Why? He's in Detroit. Let it go."I'm not going to hide my opinions. They're coming to you between 7000-4000 Angstroms for all the world to see. Oh yes, you will be enlightened."
-
-06-14-2006 #94
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
I voted for the new guy; however, the question is a little unfair. How can you even evaluate Linehan's performance when he has not even head coached 1 NFL game? I think my vote was more negative for Martzie (who I still think embodies enourmous offensive brilliance) because it was obvious that the path he chose involved a lot of damaged relationships with his players, coaches, and the media. Lastly, I have to vote a guy of the island if Marmie is even mentioned.
ARF
-
-06-14-2006 #95
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
Well, to me it seems like there is a breath of fresh air in Rams Park and the players seem to be happy.
I can relate; after five + years in the same job, things are getting stale and a change in scenery is always welcome. .JUST WIN ONE FOR THE FANS
























"HIT HARD, HIT FAST, AND HIT OFTEN"Adm. William "Bull" Halsey
-
-06-14-2006 #96
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
That was a detailed and well said post. First it's too early to tell, second Martz is gone, and third Martz made many mistakes, but without him we wouldn't have a Super Bowl win.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
BRUUUUUUUUCE

-
-06-14-2006 #97
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
Wait but isn't that just speculation.
Originally Posted by ramsbruce
-
-06-14-2006 #98
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
Maybe, but it's a lot closer to being the truth, than talking about Linehan and Martz.
Originally Posted by BIG-BLUE
BRUUUUUUUUCE

-
-06-14-2006 #99STLRAMSFAN Guest
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
Originally Posted by STLRAMSFAN
I said all along that you can’t compare them as to who is better. But you can say who you would rather have as head coach. The same as the FO did they could not say who was going to be better but they said who they wanted as head coach next season. In doing so they had to evaluate Martz and that was what I did in evaluating him. I am thankful for Martz time here but I agree its time to move on even if he would not have had FO problems. I by no means tried bashing Martz I was evaluating him. I never said he sucked. I still think IMO it was time to move on. Do I have hard facts that Linehan will be better then Martz no way and I never intended to make this thread about who is better. This whole thread was about who you would rather have. NO ONE CAN SAY WHO THE BETTER COACH IS AT THIS POINT BUT THEY CAN PICK WHO THEY WANT TO START THE SEASON AS HEAD COACH.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
None of that was intended to point to Linehan over Martz. I was just stating the reaction of the players. A lot of people thought last year that the players would be unhappy if Martz left. It don't seem that way to me. Its not speculation that Jackson was unhappy with Martz or Kennedy was unhappy with Kollar. It was not speculation that Linehan said he would provide more protection and allow Bulger to audible.
Originally Posted by STLRAMSFAN
Originally Posted by STLRAMSFAN
YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT SPECULATION THATS TRUE SPECULATION. The Atlanta playoff game was horrible and we have started tanking as a team. That is not meant to bash Martz its just meant to say the last two years were definitely not Martz best and all coaches get looked at when there team is performing poorly. IMO it was still time for a change even if he would have got along with the FO.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
That is my opinion when the coaching staff says the are going to be more committed to protecting Bulger and let him audible. Also Kennedy and Jackson are both bad mouthing the previous coaching staff. This is Not Bashing Martz at all I am not diminishing any of his abilities. I am only saying the reaction I see from the players.
Originally Posted by STLRAMSFAN
This was Not Bashing Martz it was just saying there is No Way to Compare what Martz took over and what Linehan is taking over. Martz had a far better team in his first year as head coach. It was not bashing Martz the only reason I mention Martz team doing bad the last two years is to show that Linehan does not have the talent that Martz started with in his first year.
Originally Posted by STLRAMSFAN
That my friend is speculation.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
That my friend is speculation.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
(Martz had no input according to you or your media source)
That my friend is speculation.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
(Martz had no input according to you or your media source)
These quotes were in response to me knowing who I would want to coach this coming season. They were NOT BASHING MARTZ.
Originally Posted by STLRAMSFAN
This was NOT BASHING MARTZ it was in response to you saying Martz could have hired Haslett. I think him and Haslett both are to strong willed to co-exist. It was not bashing Martz it was stating my opinion about their personalities.
Originally Posted by STLRAMSFAN
Quote:
That my friend is speculation.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
That my friend is speculation. I don't hate Martz.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
That my friend is speculation.This thread was not about hating Martz.
Originally Posted by Roy G. Biv
I do not hate Martz and never will I was supporting him going into the season last year. But when I saw the same sloppy play by our team from the beginning game until the end then I thought it was time to go in a different direction. This is not bashing Martz its just our team has played very sloppy the last two years. You could have had 200 yards rushing in the Atlanta playoff game.
Let me repeat what this whole thread was about:
It was about making a decision on which coach people would rather start this season with. It was NOT about whom do you think the better coach IS or WILL BE.Last edited by STLRAMSFAN; -06-14-2006 at 09:39 PM.
-
-06-14-2006 #100STLRAMSFAN Guest
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
The only question about Linehan and Martz in this thread is who you would rather have as head coach. I CONTINUE TO SAY ITS NOT ABOUT WHO IS OR WILL BE BETTER. There is no specualtion in chosing who you would rather have.
Originally Posted by ramsbruce
-
-06-14-2006 #101
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
Well then it's a good thing I wasn't directing my last post to you isn't it. :tongue:
Originally Posted by STLRAMSFAN
BRUUUUUUUUCE

-
-06-14-2006 #102
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
Look at Rebel13. He embraces the fact that all he posts about is how bad he hates Martz.
[/QUOTE]
I continue to be amazed at all the pain being felt by the folks who loved and defended the idiot Lion coach. I think it must be painful to admit how horribly wrong you were by supporting the savant. Does it pain you also that I was so right? HAHAHA....and by the way, I have many posts that have nothing to do with him.:tongue:Last edited by Nick; -06-15-2006 at 12:55 AM. Reason: You're 41. You can think of more mature ways to describe someone, even if you don't like him.
-
-06-14-2006 #103
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
The offensive line is far happier with the new Oline coach too. Much better treatment and more knowledgeable then the last one. This is a good thing, when the Oline has confidence in the coach it builds confidence in each other. One feeds off the other.
I still say by by midseason we have one of the best Olines in the NFL
-
-06-14-2006 #104
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
Maybe the title of this poll should have been "Was a coaching change necessary?". "Linehan vs Martz Regime", intended or not gives the perception of a "who's better" comparison, and the statement "If Martz could have gotten along with the FO" bases the entire thread on speculation and invites more of the same. Just a thought.
-
-06-15-2006 #105
Re: Linehan vs Martz Regime
If mickey mouse coaches this team to 4 playoff appearances out of 6 years I'll be happy. I don't give a mouse behind who the coach is....
JUST WIN.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote







Bookmarks