Quote:
Originally Posted by moloch41
Judgement goes both ways- if someone can judge and deem him worthy of forgiveness- why can't someone deem him unworthy of it? Now, that being said- I would only guess that he is riddled with guilt- I don't think he's a sociopath incapable of feeling remorse.
|
What you're doing is damning the man by virtue of a reported second infraction two years after the event and some eight years from the present day.
That shouldn't be enough for you to judge him unworthy of forgiveness or a second shot at life. If society were to deny him the opportunity of redemption then what purpose would punishment serve? If he can manage present a powerful lesson to impressionable youth then I'm glad he's taken the opportunity to do so and would hope he continues to do in the face of criticism.
I think there are several people with direct experience of similar circumstances who have spoken very powerfully of how it impacted their lives and its information that you've chosen to ignore in an effort to continue denigrating Little's efforts.
Any effort to insist that Little is underserving of forgiveness trespasses on territory that is the Gutweilers' and theirs alone. It is for them to give or withold their forgiveness and its for Little to continue to do the best with the opportunity he's been given.
I have nothing to forgive him for and I have nothing to damn him for. He committed a crime, paid the penalty society saw fit to give him and he has to live with the consequences the rest of his life as best he can.
Much like AV, I have no opinion of him other than as a football player and I feel questions of forgiveness are best left to others in a position to give it.